Skip to Main Content

Login to your account

Show
Forgot password?
Don’t have an account?
Create a Free Account

If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password

If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password

Cancel
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT



Property Value
Status
Version
Ad File
Disable Ads Flag
Environment
Moat Init
Moat Ready
Contextual Ready
Contextual URL
Contextual Initial Segments
Contextual Used Segments
AdUnit
SubAdUnit
Custom Targeting
Ad Events
Invalid Ad Sizes
Advertisement
The American Journal of Cardiology®
  • Submit
  • Log in
  • Register
  • Log in
    • Submit
    • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Claim
Skip menu
  • Articles
    • Cover Image - American Journal of Cardiology, Volume 192, Issue undefined
    • Latest

      • Articles in Press
      • Issues In Progress
      • Current Issue
      • Past Issues
  • Publish
    • For Authors

      • Submit Article
        External Link
      • Guide for Authors
      • Aims & Scope
      • Open Access Information
        External Link
      • Researcher Academy
        External Link
  • Topics
      • The Editor's Roundtable
      • Indexes
      • Interviews Collection
  • MultimediaDirect Link
  • About
    • Society

      • Editorial Board
      • CardioSource
        External Link
    • Journal Information

      • Aims & Scope
      • Permissions
      • Reprints
        External Link
      • Abstracting & Indexing
    • Access

      • Subscribe
      • Activate Online Access
  • Contact
    • Contact

      • Contact Us
      • Career Opportunities
        External Link
      • Advertise with Us
        External Link
      • Go to Product Catalog
        External Link
    • Follow Us

      • New Content Alerts
Advanced search
Advanced search

Please enter a term before submitting your search.

Ok
x

Filter:

Filters applied

  • Multimedia Library
  • Shiomi, HirokiRemove Shiomi, Hiroki filter
Clear all

Article Type

  • Research Article8

Publication Date

Author

  • Kimura, Takeshi8
  • Morimoto, Takeshi6
  • Furukawa, Yutaka5
  • Nakagawa, Yoshihisa5
  • Hanyu, Michiya4
  • Komiya, Tatsuhiko4
  • Nishiwaki, Noboru4
  • Sakata, Ryuzo4
  • Horie, Minoru3
  • Kadota, Kazushige3
  • Mitsudo, Kazuaki3
  • Toyota, Toshiaki3
  • Ando, Kenji2
  • Marui, Akira2
  • Nakatsuma, Kenji2
  • Natsuaki, Masahiro2
  • Okabayashi, Hitoshi2
  • Ono, Koh2
  • Shimamoto, Mitsuomi2
  • Shizuta, Satoshi2
  • Taniguchi, Tomohiko2
  • Abe, Mitsuru1
  • Akao, Masaharu1
  • Ehara, Natsuhiko1

Journal

  • American Journal of Cardiology8

Access Filter

  • Open Access

Multimedia Library

8 Results
Subscribe to collection
  • Export
    • PDF
    • Citation

Please select at least one article in order to proceed.

Ok
FilterHide Filter
  • Coronary Artery Disease

    Long-Term Outcomes After Coronary Stent Implantation in Patients Presenting With Versus Without Acute Myocardial Infarction (an Observation from Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study-Kyoto Registry Cohort-2)

    American Journal of Cardiology
    Vol. 116Issue 1p15–23Published online: April 22, 2015
    • Kyohei Yamaji
    • Masahiro Natsuaki
    • Takeshi Morimoto
    • Koh Ono
    • Yutaka Furukawa
    • Yoshihisa Nakagawa
    • and others
    Cited in Scopus: 9
    • Preview Hide Preview
    • Download PDF
    • Export Citation
      It has not been adequately addressed yet how long the excess cardiovascular event risk persists after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) compared with stable coronary artery disease. Of 10,470 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention either with sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) only or with bare-metal stent (BMS) only in the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study-Kyoto Registry Cohort-2, 3,710 (SES: n = 820 and BMS: n = 2,890) and 6,760 patients (SES: n = 4,258 and BMS: n = 2,502) presented with AMI (AMI group) and without AMI (non-AMI group), respectively.
      Long-Term Outcomes After Coronary Stent Implantation in Patients Presenting With Versus Without Acute Myocardial Infarction (an Observation from Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study-Kyoto Registry Cohort-2)
    • Coronary Artery Disease

      Meta-Analysis of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Stents

      American Journal of Cardiology
      Vol. 116Issue 2p187–194Published online: April 16, 2015
      • Toshiaki Toyota
      • Hiroki Shiomi
      • Takeshi Morimoto
      • Takeshi Kimura
      Cited in Scopus: 24
      • Preview Hide Preview
      • Download PDF
      • Export Citation
        The superiority of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) over sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) for long-term clinical outcomes has not been yet firmly established. We conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing EES directly with SES using the longest available follow-up data. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane database, and ClinicalTrials.gov for RCTs comparing outcomes between EES and SES and identified 13,434 randomly assigned patients from 14 RCTs.
        Meta-Analysis of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Stents
      • Coronary Artery Disease

        Comparison of Five-Year Outcome of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Triple-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease (from the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2)

        American Journal of Cardiology
        Vol. 116Issue 1p59–65Published online: April 6, 2015
        • Hiroki Shiomi
        • Takeshi Morimoto
        • Yutaka Furukawa
        • Yoshihisa Nakagawa
        • Junichi Tazaki
        • Ryuzo Sakata
        • and others
        Cited in Scopus: 22
        • Preview Hide Preview
        • Download PDF
        • Export Citation
          Studies evaluating long-term (≥5 years) outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using drug-eluting stents compared with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease (TVD) are still limited. We identified 2,978 patients with TVD (PCI: n = 1,824, CABG: n = 1,154) of 15,939 patients with first coronary revascularization enrolled in the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2. The primary outcome measure in the present analysis was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke.
          Comparison of Five-Year Outcome of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Triple-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease (from the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2)
        • Coronary Artery Disease

          Effect of Preinfarction Angina Pectoris on Long-term Survival in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Who Underwent Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

          American Journal of Cardiology
          Vol. 114Issue 8p1179–1186Published online: July 29, 2014
          • Tomohiko Taniguchi
          • Hiroki Shiomi
          • Toshiaki Toyota
          • Takeshi Morimoto
          • Masaharu Akao
          • Kenji Nakatsuma
          • and others
          Cited in Scopus: 13
          • Preview Hide Preview
          • Download PDF
          • Export Citation
            The influence of preinfarction angina pectoris (AP) on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial. In 5,429 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) enrolled in the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto AMI Registry, the present study population consisted of 3,476 patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI within 24 hours of symptom onset and in whom the data on preinfarction AP were available.
            Effect of Preinfarction Angina Pectoris on Long-term Survival in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Who Underwent Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
          • Coronary Artery Disease

            Comparison of Five-Year Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fractions ≤50% Versus >50% (from the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2)

            American Journal of Cardiology
            Vol. 114Issue 7p988–996Published online: July 16, 2014
            • Akira Marui
            • Takeshi Kimura
            • Noboru Nishiwaki
            • Kazuaki Mitsudo
            • Tatsuhiko Komiya
            • Michiya Hanyu
            • and others
            Cited in Scopus: 47
            • Preview Hide Preview
            • Download PDF
            • Export Citation
              Coronary heart disease is a major risk factor for left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. However, limited data are available regarding long-term benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the era of drug-eluting stent or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with LV systolic dysfunction with severe coronary artery disease. We identified 3,584 patients with 3-vessel and/or left main disease of 15,939 patients undergoing first myocardial revascularization enrolled in the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2.
              Comparison of Five-Year Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fractions ≤50% Versus >50% (from the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2)
            • Coronary Artery Disease

              Comparison of Long-Term Mortality After Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Living Alone Versus Not Living Alone at the Time of Hospitalization

              American Journal of Cardiology
              Vol. 114Issue 4p522–527Published online: June 5, 2014
              • Kenji Nakatsuma
              • Hiroki Shiomi
              • Hiroki Watanabe
              • Takeshi Morimoto
              • Tomohiko Taniguchi
              • Toshiaki Toyota
              • and others
              Cited in Scopus: 8
              • Preview Hide Preview
              • Download PDF
              • Export Citation
                Living alone was reported to be associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. There are, however, limited data on the relation between living alone and all-cause mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The Coronary REvascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto (CREDO-Kyoto) AMI registry was a cohort study of patients with AMI enrolled in 26 hospitals in Japan from 2005 through 2007. For the current analysis, we included those patients who underwent PCI within 24 hours of symptom onset, and we assessed their living status to determine if living alone would be an independent prognostic risk factor.
                Comparison of Long-Term Mortality After Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Living Alone Versus Not Living Alone at the Time of Hospitalization
              • Coronary Artery Disease

                Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease Requiring Dialysis (5-Year Outcomes of the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2)

                American Journal of Cardiology
                Vol. 114Issue 4p555–561Published online: June 5, 2014
                • Akira Marui
                • Takeshi Kimura
                • Noboru Nishiwaki
                • Kazuaki Mitsudo
                • Tatsuhiko Komiya
                • Michiya Hanyu
                • and others
                Cited in Scopus: 46
                • Preview Hide Preview
                • Download PDF
                • Export Citation
                  Ischemic heart disease is a major risk factor for morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease. However, long-term benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) relative to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in those patients is still unclear in the drug-eluting stent era. We identified 388 patients with multivessel and/or left main disease with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis among 15,939 patients undergoing first coronary revascularization enrolled in the Coronary REvascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2 (PCI: 258 patients and CABG: 130 patients).
                  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease Requiring Dialysis (5-Year Outcomes of the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2)
                • Coronary artery disease

                  Comparison of Long-Term Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease (from the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2)

                  American Journal of Cardiology
                  Vol. 110Issue 7p924–932Published online: June 21, 2012
                  • Hiroki Shiomi
                  • Takeshi Morimoto
                  • Mamoru Hayano
                  • Yutaka Furukawa
                  • Yoshihisa Nakagawa
                  • Junichi Tazaki
                  • and others
                  Cited in Scopus: 36
                  • Preview Hide Preview
                  • Download PDF
                  • Export Citation
                    The long-term outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD) remains to be investigated. We identified 1,005 patients with ULMCAD of 15,939 patients with first coronary revascularization enrolled in the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2. Cumulative 3-year incidence of a composite of death/myocardial infarction (MI)/stroke was significantly higher in the PCI group than in the CABG group (22.7% vs 14.8%, p = 0.0006, log-rank test).
                    Comparison of Long-Term Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease (from the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2)
                  Page 1 of 1
                  • Home
                  • Articles & Issues
                  • Articles In Press
                  • Current Issue
                  • List of Issues
                  • Supplements
                  • Multimedia
                  • Multimedia Library
                  • Collections
                  • The Editor's Roundtable
                  • Indexes
                  • Interviews Collection
                  • Authors
                  • About Open Access
                  • Author Information
                  • Permissions
                  • New Content Alerts
                  • Researcher Academy
                  • Submit Your Manuscript
                  • Journal Info
                  • About the Journal
                  • About Open Access
                  • Abstracting/Indexing
                  • Activate Online Access
                  • Contact Information
                  • Editorial Board
                  • Info for Advertisers
                  • Pricing
                  • New Content Alerts
                  • Subscribe
                  • Resources
                  • CardioSource
                  • Career Opportunities
                  • More Periodicals
                  • Find a Periodical
                  • Go to Product Catalog

                  The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.



                  We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the Cookie Preference Center for this site.
                  Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties.

                  • Privacy Policy  
                  • Terms and Conditions  
                  • Accessibility  
                  • Help & Contact

                  RELX