Advertisement

Are implantable cardioverter-defibrillators or drugs more effective in prolonging life?

  • The Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Trial Executive Committee
    Author Footnotes
    * See Appendix for list of AVID Trial Executive Committee.
  • Author Footnotes
    * See Appendix for list of AVID Trial Executive Committee.
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Zipes DP
        Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: lifesaver or a device looking for a disease?.
        Circulation. 1994; 89: 2934-2936
        • Josephson M
        • Nisam S
        Prospective trials of implantable cardioverter defibrillators versus drugs: are they addressing the right question?.
        Am J Cardiol. 1996; 77: 859-863
        • The AVID Investigators
        Antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID)—rationale, design, and methods.
        Am J Cardiol. 1995; 75: 470-475
        • Connolly SJ
        • Gent M
        • Roberts RS
        • Dorian P
        • Green MS
        • Klein GJ
        • Mitchell LB
        • Sheldon RS
        • Roy D
        Canadian implantable defibrillator study (CIDS): study design and organization.
        Am J Cardiol. 1993; 72: 103F-108F
        • Kim SG
        • Fogoros RN
        • Furman S
        • Connolly SJ
        • Kuck KH
        • Moss AJ
        Standardized reporting of ICD patient outcome: the report of a North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology policy conference.
        in: PACE. 16. 1993: 1358-1362
        • The CASCADE Investigators
        Randomized antiarrhythmic drug therapy in survivors of cardiac arrest (the CASCADE study).
        Am J Cardiol. 1993; 72: 280-287
        • Mason JW
        • The Electrophysiologic Study versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring Investigators
        A comparison of electrophysiologic testing with Holter monitoring to predict antiarrhythmic-drug efficacy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias.
        N Engl J Med. 1993; 329: 445-451
        • Singer I
        Letter to the editor.
        Pace. 1994; 17: 260-262
        • Powell AC
        • Fuchs T
        • Finkelstein DM
        • Garan H
        • Cannom DS
        • McGovern BA
        • Kelly E
        • Vlahakes GJ
        • Torchiana DF
        • Ruskin JN
        Influence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on the long-term prognosis of survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
        Circulation. 1993; 88: 1083-1093
        • Herre JM
        • Sauve MJ
        • Malone P
        • Griffin JC
        • Helmy I
        • Langberg JJ
        • Goldberg H
        • Scheinman MM
        Long-term results of amiodarone therapy in patients with recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989; 13: 442-449
        • Winkle RA
        • Mead RH
        • Ruder MA
        • Gaudiani VA
        • Smith NA
        • Buch WS
        • Schmidt P
        • Shipman T
        Long-term outcome with the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989; 13: 1353-1361
        • Fogoros RN
        Reply to the editor.
        Pace. 1996; 19: 384-386
        • MADIT Executive Committee
        Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT): design and clinical protocol.
        Pace. 1991; 14: 920-927
        • Mower MM
        Letter to the editor.
        Pace. 1994; 17: 258-260
        • Epstein AE
        Reply to the editor.
        Pace. 1994; 17: 262-266
        • The AVID Investigators
        Characteristics of patients enrolled in the pilot phase of the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Study (abstr).
        Pace. 1995; 18: 900
        • Kim SG
        • Love J
        • Rosenberg Y
        • Powell J
        • The AVID Investigators
        Therapy in AVID (Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators) trial is not significantly different from current clinical practice (abstr).
        Circulation. 1995; 92: I-782
        • Kuck KH
        • Siebels J
        • Schneider M
        • Geiger M
        • Hamburg Cardiac Arrest Study group
        Preliminary results of a randomized trial, AICD versus drugs (abstr).
        Rev Eur Tech Biomed. 1990; 12: 110
        • Epstein AE
        AVID necessity.
        Pace. 1993; 16: 1773-1775
        • Hallstrom A
        Letter to the editor.
        Pace. 1995; 18: 747