Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to American Journal of CardiologyReferences
- Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: A scientific statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation. 2017; 136: e232-e268
- Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock.N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 779-789
- Milrinone as compared with dobutamine in the treatment of cardiogenic shock.N Engl J Med. 2021; 385: 516-525
- Epidemiology of Shock in Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Units.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019; 12e005618
- Improved outcomes associated with the use of shock protocols: updates from the national cardiogenic shock initiative.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 93: 1173-1183
- Association of gender to outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest – a report from the international cardiac arrest registry.Crit Care. 2015; 19: 182
- Gender-based differences in outcomes among resuscitated patients With out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Circulation. 2021; 143: 641-649
- Sex differences persist in time to presentation, revascularization, and mortality in myocardial infarction treated With percutaneous coronary intervention.J Am Heart Assoc. 2019; 8e012161
- Sex differences in heart failure.Eur Heart J. 2019; 40: 3859-3868c
- Sex and gender in cardiovascular medicine: presentation and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome.Eur Heart J. 2020; 41: 1328-1336
- Incidence and outcomes of nontraumatic shock in adults using emergency medical services in Victoria, Australia.JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5e2145179
- Comparison of random forest and parametric imputation models for imputing missing data using MICE: a CALIBER study.Am J Epidemiol. 2014; 179: 764-774
- Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: A systematic review and suggestions for improvement.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007; 134: 1128-1135
- Longer pre-hospital delays and higher mortality in women with STEMI: the e-MUST registry.EuroIntervention. 2016; 12: e542-e549
- Sex differences in prehospital delays in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.J Am Heart Assoc. 2021; 10e019938
- Sex disparities in the management and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in the young.Circ Heart Fail. 2020; 13e007154
- Sex and gender disparities in the management and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction–cardiogenic shock in older adults.Mayo Clin Proc. 2020; 95: 1916-1927
- Acute myocardial infarction in women: a scientific statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation. 2016; 133: 916-947
- Women With Cardiogenic Shock Derive Greater Benefit From Early Mechanical Circulatory Support: An Update From the cVAD Registry.J Interv Cardiol. 2016; 29: 248-256
- Outcomes After percutaneous coronary intervention in women: are there differences when compared with men?.Interv Cardiol. 2019; 14: 70-75
- Women have lower chances than men to be resuscitated and survive out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Eur Heart J. 2019; 40: 3824-3834
- PCI strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.N Engl J Med. 2017; 377: 2419-2432
- Sex differences in symptom phenotypes among patients With acute myocardial infarction.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020; 13e005948
- Impact of socioeconomic status on clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019; 12e004979
- ACC CVD in Women Committee. Emergence of nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a woman's problem and need for change in definition on angiography.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66: 1918-1933https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.876
- Ten-year trends in the incidence and treatment of cardiogenic shock.Ann Intern Med. 2008; 149: 618-626
- Outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndromes.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 96: E257-E267
- A standardized and comprehensive approach to the management of cardiogenic shock.JACC Heart Fail. 2020; 8: 879-891
- Multidisciplinary code shock team in cardiogenic shock: a Canadian centre experience.CJC Open. 2020; 2: 249-257
- Shock team approach in refractory cardiogenic shock requiring short-term mechanical circulatory support: a proof of concept.Circulation. 2019; 140: 98-100
Article Info
Publication History
Footnotes
Drs. Smith and Stub contributed equally as co-senior authors.
Dr. Stub is supported by a National Heart Foundation Fellowship. Drs. Bloom and Dawson are supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Canberra, Australia and National Heart Foundation Post Graduate Scholarships. Dr. Nehme is supported by a NHMRC Early Career Fellowship. Dr. Andrew is supported by an NHMRC postgraduate scholarship. Dr. Kaye is supported by an NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship.