Relation of Operator Volume and Access Site to Short-Term Mortality in Radial Versus Femoral Access for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

      The relation between operator volume and mortality of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) procedures for ST-elevation myocardial infarction has not been studied comprehensively. This study included patients who underwent PPCI between 2010 and 2017 in all nonfederal hospitals approved to perform PCI in New York State. We compared risk-adjusted in-hospital/30-day mortality for radial access (RA) and femoral access (FA) and the relation between risk-adjusted mortality and procedure volume for each access site. In 44,540 patients in the study period, the use of RA rose from 8% in 2,010% to 43% in 2017 (p <0.0001). There was no significant change in PPCI risk-adjusted mortality during the period (p=0.27 for trend). RA was associated with lower mortality when imposing operator exclusion criteria used in recent trials. There was a significant operator inverse volume-mortality relation for FA procedures but not for RA procedures. FA procedures performed by lower volume FA operators (lowest quartile) were associated with higher risk-adjusted mortality compared with RA procedures (3.71% vs 3.06%, p = 0.01) or compared with FA procedures performed by higher volume FA operators (3.71% vs 3.16%, p = 0.01).
      In conclusion, in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction referred for primary PCI in New York State, there was a significant uptake in the use of RA along with relatively constant in-hospital/30-day mortality. There was a significant inverse operator volume-mortality relation for FA procedures accompanied by higher mortality for FA procedures performed by low volume FA operators than for all other primary PCI procedures. In conclusion, this information underscores the need for operators to remain vigilant in maintaining FA skills and monitoring FA outcomes.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Romagnoli E
        • Biondi-Zoccai G
        • Sciahbasi A
        • Politi L
        • Rigattieri S
        • Pendenza G
        • Summaria F
        • Patrizi R
        • Borghi A
        • Di Russo C
        • Moretti C
        • Agostoni P
        • Loschiavo P
        • Lioy E
        • Sheiban I
        • Sangiorgi G.
        Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60: 2481-2489
        • Bernat I
        • Horak D
        • Stasek J
        • Mates M
        • Pesek J
        • Ostadal P
        • Hrabos V
        • Dusek J
        • Koza J
        • Sembera Z
        • Brtko M
        • Aschermann O
        • Smid M
        • Polansky P
        • Al Mawiri A
        • Vojacek J
        • Bis J
        • Costerousse O
        • Bertrand OF
        • Rokyta R
        ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial: the STEMI-RADIAL trial.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63: 964-972
        • Mehta SR
        • Jolly SS
        • Cairns J
        • Niemela K
        • Rao SV
        • Cheema AN
        • Steg PG
        • Cantor WJ
        • Džavík V
        • Budaj A
        • Rokoss M
        • Valentin V
        • Gao P
        • Yusuf S
        • Investigators RIVAL
        Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60: 2490-2499
        • Jolly SS
        • Yusuf S
        • Cairns J
        • Niemelä K
        • Xavier D
        • Widimsky P
        • Budaj A
        • Niemelä M
        • Valentin V
        • Lewis BS
        • Avezum A
        • Steg PG
        • Rao SV
        • Gao P
        • Afzal R
        • Joyner CD
        • Chrolavicius S
        • Mehta SR
        • Trial Group RIVAL
        Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial.
        Lancet. 2011; 377: 1409-1420
        • Jolly SS
        • Amlani S
        • Hamon M
        • Yusuf S
        • Mehta SR.
        Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
        Am Heart J. 2009; 157: 132-140
        • Valgimigli M
        • Gagnor A
        • Calabró P
        • Frigoli E
        • Leonardi S
        • Zaro T
        • Rubartelli P
        • Briguori C
        • Andò G
        • Repetto A
        • Limbruno U
        • Cortese B
        • Sganzerla P
        • Lupi A
        • Galli M
        • Colangelo S
        • Ierna S
        • Ausiello A
        • Presbitero P
        • Sardella G
        • Varbella F
        • Esposito G
        • Santarelli A
        • Tresoldi S
        • Nazzaro M
        • Zingarelli A
        • de Cesare N
        • Rigattieri S
        • Tosi P
        • Palmieri C
        • Brugaletta S
        • Rao SV
        • Heg D
        • Rothenbühler M
        • Vranckx P
        • Jüni P
        MATRIX Investigators. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial.
        Lancet. 2015; 385: 2465-2476
        • Feldman DN
        • Swaminathan RV
        • Kaltenbach LA
        • Baklanov DV
        • Kim LK
        • Wong SC
        • Minutello RM
        • Messenger JC
        • Moussa I
        • Garratt KN
        • Piana RN
        • Hillegass WB
        • Cohen MG
        • Gilchrist IC
        • Rao SV.
        Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007–2012).
        Circulation. 2013; 127: 2295-2306
        • Ratib K
        • Mamas MA
        • Anderson SG
        • Bhatia G
        • Routledge H
        • De Belder M
        • Ludman PF
        • Fraser D
        • Nolan J
        British Cardiovascular Intervention Society and the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research. Access site practice and procedural outcomes in relation to clinical presentation in 439,947 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United Kingdom.
        JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8: 20-29
        • Rao SV
        • McCoy LA
        • Spertus JA
        • Krone RJ
        • Singh M
        • Fitzgerald S
        • Peterson ED.
        An updated bleeding model to predict the risk of post-procedure bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report using an expanded bleeding definition from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry.
        JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 6: 897-904
        • Rao SV
        • Cohen MG
        • Kandzari DE
        • Bertrand OF
        • Gilchrist IC.
        The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55: 2187-2195
        • Le May M
        • Wells G
        • So D
        • Chong AY
        • Dick A
        • Froeschl M
        • Glover C
        • Hibbert B
        • Marquis JF
        • Blondeau M
        • Osborne C
        • MacDougall A
        • Kass M
        • Paddock V
        • Quraishi A
        • Labinaz M
        Safety and efficacy of femoral access vs radial access in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the SAFARI-STEMI randomized clinical trial.
        JAMA Cardiol. 2020; 5: 126-134
        • Baklanov DV
        • Kaltenbach LA
        • Marso SP
        • Subherwal SS
        • Feldman DN
        • Garratt KN
        • Curtis JP
        • Messenger JC
        • Rao SV.
        The prevalence and outcomes of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61: 420-426
        • Hannan EL
        • Farrell LS
        • Walford G
        • Berger PB
        • Stamato NJ
        • Venditti FJ
        • Jacobs AK
        • Holmes Jr, DR
        • Sharma S
        • King 3rd, SB
        Utilization of radial artery access for percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in New York.
        JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 7: 276-283
        • Pristipino C
        • Roncella A
        • Trani C
        • Nazzaro MS
        • Berni A
        • Di Sciascio G
        • Sciahbasi A
        • Musarò SD
        • Mazzarotto P
        • Gioffrè G
        • Speciale G
        Prospective Registry of Vascular Access in Interventions in Lazio region (PREVAIL) study group. Identifying factors that predict the choice and success rate of radial artery catheterisation in contemporary real world cardiology practice: a sub-analysis of the PREVAIL study data.
        EuroIntervention. 2010; 6: 240-246
        • Singh S
        • Singh M
        • Grewal N
        • Khosla S.
        Transradial vs transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
        Can J Cardiol. 2016; 32: 777-790
        • Mason PJ
        • Shah B
        • Tamis-Holland JE
        • Bittl JA
        • Cohen MG
        • Safirstein J
        • Drachman DE
        • Valle JA
        • Rhodes D
        • Gilchrist IC
        American Heart Association Interventional Cardiovascular Care Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; and Council on Genomic and Precision Medicine. An update on radial artery access and best practices for transradial coronary angiography and intervention in acute coronary syndrome: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.
        Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11 (September)e000035
        • Le May MR
        • Singh K
        • Wells GA
        Efficacy of radial versus femoral access in the acute coronary syndrome: is it the operation or the operator that matters?.
        JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8: 1405-1409
        • Azzalini L
        • Tosin K
        • Chabot-Blanchet M
        • Avram R
        • Ly HQ
        • Gaudet B
        • Gallo R
        • Doucet S
        • Tanguay JF
        • Ibrahim R
        • Grégoire JC
        • Crépeau J
        • Bonan R
        • de Guise P
        • Nosair M
        • Dorval JF
        • Gosselin G
        • L'Allier PL
        • Guertin MC
        • Asgar AW
        • Jolicœur EM
        The benefits conferred by radial access for cardiac catheterization are offset by a paradoxical increase in the rate of vascular access site complications with femoral access: the Campeau Radial Paradox.
        JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8: 1854-1864
        • Kopin D
        • Seth M
        • Sukul D
        • Dixon S
        • Aronow HD
        • Lee D
        • Tucciarone M
        • Pielsticker E
        • Gurm HS.
        Primary and secondary vascular access site complications associated with percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the BMC2 Registry.
        JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 22: 2247-2256
        • Shoji S
        • Kohsaka S
        • Kumamaru H
        • Sawano M
        • Shiraishi Y
        • Ueda I
        • Noma S
        • Suzuki M
        • Numasawa Y
        • Hayashida K
        • Yuasa S
        • Miyata H
        • Fukuda K.
        Stroke after percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of transradial intervention: report from a Japanese multicenter registry.
        Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11e006761
        • Di Santo P
        • Simard T
        • Wells GA
        • Jung RG
        • Ramirez FD
        • Boland P
        • Marbach JA
        • Parlow S
        • Kyeremanteng K
        • Coyle D
        • Fergusson D
        • Russo JJ
        • Chong AY
        • Froeschl M
        • So DY
        • Dick A
        • Glover C
        • Labinaz M
        • Hibbert B
        • Le May M
        Transradial versus transfemoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021; 14e009994
        • Lawton JS
        • Tamis-Holland JE
        • Bangalore S
        • Bates ER
        • Beckie TM
        • Bischoff JM
        • Bittl JA
        • Cohen MG
        • DiMaio JM
        • Don CW
        • Fremes SE
        • Gaudino MF
        • Goldberger ZD
        • Grant MC
        • Jaswal JB
        • Kurlansky PA
        • Mehran R
        • Metkus Jr, TS
        • Nnacheta LC
        • Rao SV
        • Sellke FW
        • Sharma G
        • Yong CM
        • Zwischenberger BA.
        2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines.
        Circulation. 2022; 145: e18-e114
        • Hulme W
        • Sperrin M
        • Kontopopantelis E
        • Ratib K
        • Ludman P
        • Sirker A
        • Kinnaird T
        • Curzen N
        • Kwok CS
        • De Belder M
        • Nolan J
        • Mamas MA.
        British Cardiovascular Intervention Society and the National Institute of Cardiovascular Outcomes Research. Increased radial access is not associated with worse femoral outcomes for percutaneous coronary interventions in the United Kingdom.
        Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10e004279
        • Le May MR
        • Wells GA
        Unraveling the radial paradox.
        Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10e004865
        • Mitchell MD
        • Hong JA
        • Lee BY
        • Umscheid CA
        • Bartsch SM
        • Don CW.
        Systematic review and cost-benefit analysis of radial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention.
        Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012; 5: 454-462
        • Safley DM
        • Amin AP
        • House JA
        • Baklanov D
        • Mills R
        • Giersiefen H
        • Bremer A
        • Marso SP.
        Comparison of costs between transradial and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention: a cohort analysis from the Premier research database.
        Am Heart J. 2013; 165 (e2): 303-309
        • Cooper CJ
        • El-Shiekh RA
        • Cohen DJ
        • Blaesing L
        • Burket MW
        • Basu A
        • Moore JA.
        Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: a randomized comparison.
        Am Heart J. 1999; 138: 430-436
        • Hess CN
        • Krucoff MW
        • Sheng S
        • Anstrom KJ
        • Barham WB
        • Gilchrist IC
        • Harrington RA
        • Jacobs AK
        • Mehran R
        • Messenger JC
        • Mark DB
        • Rao SV.
        Comparison of quality-of-life measures after radial versus femoral artery access for cardiac catheterization in women: results of the study of access site for enhancement of percutaneous coronary intervention for women quality-of-life substudy.
        Am Heart J. 2015; 170: 371-379