The physiological changes that occur during pregnancy can be deleterious to women
with a cardiovascular condition. Evidence-based contraceptive counseling and provision
is essential in this patient population. Although long-acting reversible contraception
(LARCs), which include the intrauterine device (IUD) and the etonogestrel contraceptive
implant, have been found to be safe and effective in healthy women, there are inadequate
data regarding LARC use in patients with cardiovascular conditions. We conducted a
retrospective chart review of women diagnosed with cardiovascular disease who had
a copper IUD, levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or contraceptive implant
placed at the University of Washington Medical Center from 2007 to 2012. We abstracted
and analyzed patient demographic characteristics, medical conditions, indications
for LARC placement, and complications. The sample included 470 women with cardiovascular
conditions. The mean age was 34.6 years. One hundred twenty-four patients (26.11%)
were nulligravid and 169 patients (35.58%) were nulliparous. Four hundred ten chose
the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (87.23%), 33 patients (7.02%) opted
for the copper IUD, and 23 patients (4.89%) chose the etonogestrel implant. Eighteen
patients (3.83%) had a confirmed IUD expulsion, 2 patients (0.43%) became pregnant,
and there were 4 cases of pelvic inflammatory disease (0.85%). There were no cases
of perforation. There were no confirmed cases of infective endocarditis associated
with LARC insertion. In conclusion, LARC devices appear safe with few complications
for women with cardiovascular conditions. Clinicians can be reassured that LARC may
be offered as an appropriate option when counseling women with cardiovascular disease
on safe contraceptive methods.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to American Journal of CardiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010.MMWR Early Release. 2010; 59: 53-55
- Risks of contraception and pregnancy in heart disease.Heart. 2006; 92: 1520-1525
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.J Biomed Inform. 2009; 42: 377-381
- Contraceptive failure in the United States.Contraception. 2011; 83: 397-404
- Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception.N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 1998-2007
- Association of age and parity with intrauterine device expulsion.Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124: 718-726
- A Clinical Guide for Contraception.Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA2010: 432
- Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Study on intrauterine devices.Contraception. 2015; 91: 274-279
- Bleeding patterns and clinical performance of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) up to two years.Contraception. 2002; 65: 129-132
- The effects of Implanon on menstrual bleeding patterns.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008; 13: 13-28
- Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception.Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117: 1105-1113
- Contraceptive Technology.Ardent Media, New York, NY2007: 875
Article Info
Publication History
Published online: November 05, 2015
Accepted:
October 24,
2015
Received in revised form:
October 24,
2015
Received:
June 18,
2015
Footnotes
This project was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number TL1TR000422 (Seattle/Washington).
See page 304 for disclosure information.
Identification
Copyright
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.