Advertisement

Usefulness of a Normal Coronary Angiogram in Patients Aged ≥65 Years to Foretell Survival

      A normal coronary angiogram (CA) has been reported to confer a good prognosis. However, how this applies to patients aged ≥65 years is not well known. From 1986 to 1996, 11,625 patients aged ≥65 underwent coronary angiography. We identified 271 patients with either normal (NORM, n = 160) CA or <30% diameter stenosis disease (NEAR-NORM, n = 111). Using the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System, we examined the probability of survival and the risk of developing an ischemic event or undergoing a revascularization procedure during an average of 15.1 ± 6.2 years (range 0.5 to 25.8 years). Matched actuarial subjects were used to compare survival to the general population. The incidence of an ischemic event was low (2.0 events per 100 persons/year for the NORM and 2.8 patients per 100 persons/year for the NEAR-NORM group, p = NS). Rates of revascularization were higher in the NEAR-NORM group compared to the NORM group (1 per 100 persons/year vs 0.5 per 100 persons/year, p = 0.04). During the 25.8-year follow-up, there were 77 deaths (48.4%) for the NORM and 64 (57.1%) for the NEAR-NORM group (χ2 = 1.7, NS). The NORM group survived 6,789 days, 1,517 more days than the actuarial subjects (95% confidence interval [CI] 1,072 to 1,956; p <0.0001) and the NEAR-NORM group survived 5,922 days, 875 more days (95% CI 368 to 1,376; p <0.005). In conclusion, patients with normal or near-normal CA at age ≥65 years have a low rate of myocardial ischemic events and have significantly longer survival than matched subjects from the general population.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bruschke A.V.
        • Proudfit W.L.
        • Sones F.M.
        Clinical course of patients with normal, and slightly or moderately abnormal coronary arteriograms: a follow-up study on 500 patients.
        Circulation. 1973; 47: 936-945
        • Proudfit W.L.
        • Bruschke V.G.
        • Sones Jr., F.M.
        Clinical course of patients with normal or slightly or moderately abnormal coronary arteriograms: 10-year follow-up of 521 patients.
        Circulation. 1980; 62: 712-717
        • Lichtlen P.
        • Bargheer K.
        • Wenzlaff P.
        Long-term prognosis of patients with angina like chest pain and normal coronary angiographic findings.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25: 1013-1018
        • Kemp H.G.
        • Kronmal R.A.
        • Vlietstra R.E.
        • Frye R.L.
        Seven year survival of patients with normal or near normal coronary arteriograms: a CASS registry study.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986; 7: 479-483
        • Kostis J.B.
        • Wilson A.C.
        • O’Dowd K.
        • Gregory P.
        • Chelton S.
        • Cosgrove N.M.
        • Chirala A.
        • Cui T.
        Sex differences in the management and long-term outcome of acute myocardial infarction. A statewide study. MIDAS Study Group. Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System.
        Circulation. 1994; 90: 1715-1730
        • Kostis W.J.
        • Cabrera J.
        • Messerli F.H.
        • Cheng J.Q.
        • Sedjro J.E.
        • Cosgrove N.M.
        • Swerdel J.N.
        • Deng Y.
        • Davis B.R.
        • Kostis J.B.
        Competing cardiovascular and noncardiovascular risks and longevity in the systolic hypertension in the elderly program.
        AMJ Cardiol. 2014; 113: 676-681
        • Hammersley J.M.
        • Handscomb D.C.
        Monte Carlo Methods.
        Methuen, London1967
        • R Core Team
        R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
        R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria2014 (Available at:)
        • Lloyd-Jones D.M.
        • Larson M.G.
        • Beiser A.
        • Levy D.
        Lifetime risk of developing coronary artery disease.
        Lancet. 1999; 353: 89-92
        • Kostis W.J.
        • Deng Y.
        • Pantazopoulos J.S.
        • Moreyra A.E.
        • Kostis J.B.
        • Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System (MIDAS 14) Study Group
        Trends in mortality of acute myocardial infarction after discharge from the hospital.
        Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010; 3: 581-589
        • Palmeri S.T.
        • Akula D.N.
        • Agarwal S.
        • Wilson A.C.
        • Casazza L.
        • Moreyra A.E.
        Late angiographic follow-up in adults with initial angiographic normal or minimally narrowed coronary arteries.
        Am J Cardiol. 2007; 99: 1374-1377
        • Rowe R.
        • Parviz Y.
        • Iqbal J.
        • Heppenstall J.
        • Teare D.
        • Gunn J.
        Repeat coronary with previously normal arteries: a futile exercise?.
        Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent. 2015; 85: 401-405
        • Rosenthal R.L.
        The 50% coronary stenosis.
        Am J Cardiol. 2015; 115: 1162-1165
        • Proudfit W.L.
        • Welch C.C.
        • Siqueira C.
        • Morcerf F.P.
        • Sheldon W.C.
        Prognosis of 1000 young women studied by coronary angiography.
        Circulation. 1981; 64: 1185-1190
        • Bonow R.O.
        • Bohannon N.
        • Hazzard W.
        Risk stratification in coronary artery disease and special populations.
        Am J Med. 1996; 101: 17S-24S
        • Bugiardini R.
        • Manfrini O.
        • De Ferrari G.M.
        Unanswered questions for management of acute coronary syndrome: risk stratification of patients with minimal disease or normal findings on coronary angiography.
        Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166: 1391-1395