Impact of Visit-to-Visit Variability and Systolic Blood Pressure Control on Subsequent Outcomes in Hypertensive Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (from the HIJ-CREATE Substudy)

      Although visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure (BP) is a strong predictor of stroke, the impact on subsequent major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) in terms of secondary prevention remains unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability in systolic BP on subsequent MACE in hypertensive patients with CAD. In the Heart Institute of Japan Candesartan Randomised Trial for Evaluation in Coronary Artery Disease, a total of 2,049 hypertensive patients with CAD were enrolled. Incidence of MACEs in addition to biochemistry tests and office BP were determined during follow-up. Achieved BP was defined as the mean value of systolic BP in patients who did not experience MACE and the mean value of systolic BP before MACE in those who experienced MACE during follow-up. In the present study, 1,734 patients had multiple follow-up visits (≥3 times) until their final follow-up. During a median follow-up of 4.2 years, the primary outcome occurred in 317 patients (18.3%). Visit-to-visit variability of systolic BP was defined as the SD. Participants were divided into equal quartiles based on the mean systolic BP during follow-up and visit-to-visit variability of systolic BP, respectively. Although there was no relation between visit-to-visit variability of systolic BP and the incidence of MACE, the highest quartile based on mean systolic BP showed a significant relation with subsequent MACE. In conclusion, in hypertensive patients with CAD, inadequate BP control is a strong predictor of subsequent MACE, whereas visit-to-visit variability of systolic BP is not.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Lewington S.
        • Clarke R.
        • Qizilbash N.
        • Peto R.
        • Collins R.
        Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies.
        Lancet. 2002; 360: 1903-1913
        • Yusuf S.
        • Hawken S.
        • Ounpuu S.
        • Dans T.
        • Avezum A.
        • Lanas F.
        • McQueen M.
        • Budaj A.
        • Pais P.
        • Varigos J.
        • Lisheng L.
        Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study.
        Lancet. 2004; 364: 937-952
        • Kasanuki H.
        • Honda T.
        • Haze K.
        • Sumiyoshi T.
        • Horie T.
        • Yagi M.
        • Yamaguchi J.
        • Ishii Y.
        • Fujii S.Y.
        • Nagashima M.
        • Okada H.
        • Koganei H.
        • Koyanagi R.
        • Tsurumi Y.
        • Kimura H.
        • Ogawa H.
        A large-scale prospective cohort study on the current status of therapeutic modalities for acute myocardial infarction in Japan: rationale and initial results of the HIJAMI Registry.
        Am Heart J. 2005; 150: 411-418
        • Hansson L.
        • Zanchetti A.
        • Carruthers S.G.
        • Dahlof B.
        • Elmfeldt D.
        • Julius S.
        • Menard J.
        • Rahn K.H.
        • Wedel H.
        • Westerling S.
        Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group.
        Lancet. 1998; 351: 1755-1762
        • Hansson L.
        • Lindholm L.H.
        • Niskanen L.
        • Lanke J.
        • Hedner T.
        • Niklason A.
        • Luomanmaki K.
        • Dahlof B.
        • de Faire U.
        • Morlin C.
        • Karlberg B.E.
        • Wester P.O.
        • Bjorck J.E.
        Effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) randomised trial.
        Lancet. 1999; 353: 611-616
        • Hansson L.
        • Hedner T.
        • Lund-Johansen P.
        • Kjeldsen S.E.
        • Lindholm L.H.
        • Syvertsen J.O.
        • Lanke J.
        • de Faire U.
        • Dahlof B.
        • Karlberg B.E.
        Randomised trial of effects of calcium antagonists compared with diuretics and beta-blockers on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Nordic Diltiazem (NORDIL) study.
        Lancet. 2000; 356: 359-365
        • Sundstrom J.
        • Arima H.
        • Jackson R.
        • Turnbull F.
        • Rahimi K.
        • Chalmers J.
        • Woodward M.
        • Neal B.
        Effects of blood pressure reduction in mild hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Ann Intern Med. 2015; 162: 184-191
        • Bangalore S.
        • Kumar S.
        • Volodarskiy A.
        • Messerli F.H.
        Blood pressure targets in patients with coronary artery disease: observations from traditional and Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of randomised trials.
        Heart. 2013; 99: 601-613
        • Kawai T.
        • Ohishi M.
        • Ito N.
        • Onishi M.
        • Takeya Y.
        • Yamamoto K.
        • Kamide K.
        • Rakugi H.
        Alteration of vascular function is an important factor in the correlation between visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and cardiovascular disease.
        J Hypertens. 2013; 31: 1387-1395
        • Muntner P.
        • Shimbo D.
        • Tonelli M.
        • Reynolds K.
        • Arnett D.K.
        • Oparil S.
        The relationship between visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure and all-cause mortality in the general population: findings from NHANES III, 1988 to 1994.
        Hypertension. 2011; 57: 160-166
        • Coutinho T.
        • Turner S.T.
        • Kullo I.J.
        Aortic pulse wave velocity is associated with measures of subclinical target organ damage.
        JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011; 4: 754-761
        • Eguchi K.
        • Hoshide S.
        • Schwartz J.E.
        • Shimada K.
        • Kario K.
        Visit-to-visit and ambulatory blood pressure variability as predictors of incident cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension.
        Am J Hypertens. 2012; 25: 962-968
        • Suchy-Dicey A.M.
        • Wallace E.R.
        • Mitchell S.V.
        • Aguilar M.
        • Gottesman R.F.
        • Rice K.
        • Kronmal R.
        • Psaty B.M.
        • Longstreth Jr., W.T.
        Blood pressure variability and the risk of all-cause mortality, incident myocardial infarction, and incident stroke in the cardiovascular health study.
        Am J Hypertens. 2013; 26: 1210-1217
        • Poortvliet R.K.
        • Ford I.
        • Lloyd S.M.
        • Sattar N.
        • Mooijaart S.P.
        • de Craen A.J.
        • Westendorp R.G.
        • Jukema J.W.
        • Packard C.J.
        • Gussekloo J.
        • de Ruijter W.
        • Stott D.J.
        Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular risk in the PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER).
        PLoS One. 2012; 7: e52438
        • Rothwell P.M.
        • Howard S.C.
        • Dolan E.
        • O'Brien E.
        • Dobson J.E.
        • Dahlof B.
        • Sever P.S.
        • Poulter N.R.
        Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension.
        Lancet. 2010; 375: 895-905
        • Mancia G.
        Prognostic value of long-term blood pressure variability: the evidence is growing.
        Hypertension. 2011; 57: 141-143
        • Parati G.
        • Pomidossi G.
        • Albini F.
        • Malaspina D.
        • Mancia G.
        Relationship of 24-hour blood pressure mean and variability to severity of target-organ damage in hypertension.
        J Hypertens. 1987; 5: 93-98
        • Tatasciore A.
        • Renda G.
        • Zimarino M.
        • Soccio M.
        • Bilo G.
        • Parati G.
        • Schillaci G.
        • De Caterina R.
        Awake systolic blood pressure variability correlates with target-organ damage in hypertensive subjects.
        Hypertension. 2007; 50: 325-332
        • Matsui Y.
        • Ishikawa J.
        • Eguchi K.
        • Shibasaki S.
        • Shimada K.
        • Kario K.
        Maximum value of home blood pressure: a novel indicator of target organ damage in hypertension.
        Hypertension. 2011; 57: 1087-1093
        • Kikuya M.
        • Hozawa A.
        • Ohokubo T.
        • Tsuji I.
        • Michimata M.
        • Matsubara M.
        • Ota M.
        • Nagai K.
        • Araki T.
        • Satoh H.
        • Ito S.
        • Hisamichi S.
        • Imai Y.
        Prognostic significance of blood pressure and heart rate variabilities: the Ohasama study.
        Hypertension. 2000; 36: 901-906
        • Shimbo D.
        • Newman J.D.
        • Aragaki A.K.
        • LaMonte M.J.
        • Bavry A.A.
        • Allison M.
        • Manson J.E.
        • Wassertheil-Smoller S.
        Association between annual visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and stroke in postmenopausal women: data from the Women's Health Initiative.
        Hypertension. 2012; 60: 625-630
        • Schutte R.
        • Thijs L.
        • Liu Y.P.
        • Asayama K.
        • Jin Y.
        • Odili A.
        • Gu Y.M.
        • Kuznetsova T.
        • Jacobs L.
        • Staessen J.A.
        Within-subject blood pressure level—not variability—predicts fatal and nonfatal outcomes in a general population.
        Hypertension. 2012; 60: 1138-1147
        • Kasanuki H.
        • Hagiwara N.
        • Hosoda S.
        • Sumiyoshi T.
        • Honda T.
        • Haze K.
        • Nagashima M.
        • Yamaguchi J.
        • Origasa H.
        • Urashima M.
        • Ogawa H.
        Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based vs. non-angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and hypertension: the Heart Institute of Japan Candesartan Randomized Trial for Evaluation in Coronary Artery Disease (HIJ-CREATE).
        Eur Heart J. 2009; 30: 1203-1212
        • Braunwald E.
        Unstable angina. A classification.
        Circulation. 1989; 80: 410-414
        • Webb A.J.
        • Fischer U.
        • Rothwell P.M.
        Effects of beta-blocker selectivity on blood pressure variability and stroke: a systematic review.
        Neurology. 2011; 77: 731-737
        • Stergiou G.S.
        • Kollias A.
        • Ntineri A.
        Assessment of drug effects on blood pressure variability: which method and which index?.
        J Hypertens. 2014; 32: 1197-1200
        • Smith T.R.
        • Drozda Jr., J.P.
        • Vanslette J.A.
        • Hoeffken A.S.
        • Nicholson R.A.
        Medication class effects on visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure measurements: analysis of electronic health record data in the “real world”.
        J Clin Hypertens. 2013; 15: 655-662
        • Rothwell P.M.
        • Howard S.C.
        • Dolan E.
        • O'Brien E.
        • Dobson J.E.
        • Dahlof B.
        • Poulter N.R.
        • Sever P.S.
        Effects of beta blockers and calcium-channel blockers on within-individual variability in blood pressure and risk of stroke.
        Lancet Neurol. 2010; 9: 469-480