Advertisement

Relationship Between Serum Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and In-hospital Mortality Following Acute Myocardial Infarction (The Lipid Paradox)

Published:December 23, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.12.006
      Lipoprotein levels are currently recognized as independent risk factors for long-term cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). During the acute-phase reaction after AMI, previous studies have reported trends of decreased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), increased triglycerides, and variable high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels. However, the association between LDL-C and HDL-C levels and in-hospital mortality has not been well established following AMI. The relationship between lipid levels and in-hospital all-cause mortality in 115,492 patients hospitalized for AMI (July 2002 to December 2006), registered in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI) 4b–5, was evaluated using multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models. Mean LDL-C was 104 ± 38, HDL-C was 41 ± 14, and triglycerides 143 ± 83 mg/dl. Compared with the lowest quartile of LDL-C (<77 mg/dl), the risk of in-hospital mortality in the second to fourth quartiles was decreased (adjusted odds ratio 0.79, 0.80, and 0.85, respectively). For HDL-C, only those in the lowest quartile (<31 mg/dl) had higher risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.20) compared with the highest quartile (≥47 mg/dl). Results from NRMI 4b–5 suggest a lipid paradox, with lower LDL-C levels associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality, contrary to findings outside the acute setting. Consistent with previous analyses, lowest HDL-C levels were associated with increased in-hospital mortality. In conclusion, further explorations of the relationship between very low levels of LDL-C, myocardial necrosis, and subsequent adverse cardiovascular events are warranted.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Duffy D.
        • Holmes D.N.
        • Roe M.T.
        • Peterson E.D.
        The impact of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels on long-term outcomes after non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
        Am Heart J. 2012; 163: 705-713
        • Murphy S.A.
        • Cannon C.P.
        • Wiviott S.D.
        • McCabe C.H.
        • Braunwald E.
        Reduction in recurrent cardiovascular events with intensive lipid-lowering statin therapy compared with moderate lipid-lowering statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes from the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 (Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 22) trial.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54: 2358-2362
        • Smith Jr., S.C.
        • Allen J.
        • Blair S.N.
        • Bonow R.O.
        • Brass L.M.
        • Fonarow G.C.
        • Grundy S.M.
        • Hiratzka L.
        • Jones D.
        • Krumholz H.M.
        • Mosca L.
        • Pearson T.
        • Pfeffer M.A.
        • Taubert K.A.
        AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update endorsed by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 2130-2139
        • Sniderman A.
        • Thanassoulis G.
        • Couture P.
        • Williams K.
        • Alam A.
        • Furberg C.D.
        Is lower and lower better and better? A re-evaluation of the evidence from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration meta-analysis for low-density lipoprotein lowering.
        J Clin Lipidol. 2012; 6: 303-309
        • French W.J.
        • Reddy V.S.
        • Barron H.V.
        Transforming quality of care and improving outcomes after acute MI: lessons from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction.
        JAMA. 2012; 308: 771-772
        • Rogers W.J.
        • Bowlby L.J.
        • Chandra N.C.
        • French W.J.
        • Gore J.M.
        • Lambrew C.T.
        • Rubison R.M.
        • Tiefenbrunn A.J.
        • Weaver W.D.
        Treatment of myocardial infarction in the United States (1990 to 1993). Observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction.
        Circulation. 1994; 90: 2103-2114
        • Rogers W.J.
        • Canto J.G.
        • Lambrew C.T.
        • Tiefenbrunn A.J.
        • Kinkaid B.
        • Shoultz D.A.
        • Frederick P.D.
        • Every N.
        Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the US from 1990 through 1999: the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 1, 2 and 3.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 2056-2063
        • Grundy S.M.
        • Cleeman J.I.
        • Merz C.N.
        • Brewer Jr., H.B.
        • Clark L.T.
        • Hunninghake D.B.
        • Pasternak R.C.
        • Smith Jr., S.C.
        • Stone N.J.
        Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines.
        Circulation. 2004; 110: 227-239
        • American Diabetes Association
        Standards of medical care in diabetes—2011.
        Diabetes Care. 2011; 34: S11-S61
      1. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Exert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III), Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report.
        Circulation. 2002; 106: 3143-3421
        • Pitt B.
        • Loscalzo J.
        • Ycas J.
        • Raichlen J.S.
        Lipid levels after acute coronary syndromes.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51: 1440-1445
        • Rosenson R.S.
        Myocardial injury: the acute phase response and lipoprotein metabolism.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 22: 933-940
        • Fahie-Wilson M.
        • Mills R.
        • Wilson K.
        HDL cholesterol and the acute phase reaction following myocardial infarction and acute pancreatitis.
        Clin Chim Acta. 1987; 167: 197-209
        • Correia L.C.
        • Rocha M.S.
        • Esteves J.P.
        HDL-cholesterol level provides additional prognosis in acute coronary syndromes.
        Int J Cardiol. 2009; 136: 307-314
        • Olsson A.G.
        • Schwartz G.G.
        • Szarek M.
        • Sasiela W.J.
        • Ezekowitz M.D.
        • Ganz P.
        • Oliver M.F.
        • Waters D.
        • Zeiher A.
        High-density lipoprotein, but not low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels influence short-term prognosis after acute coronary syndrome: results from the MIRACL trial.
        Eur Heart J. 2005; 26: 890-896
        • O'Gara P.T.
        • Kushner F.G.
        • Ascheim D.D.
        • Casey Jr., D.E.
        • Chung M.K.
        • de Lemos J.A.
        • Ettinger S.M.
        • Fang J.C.
        • Fesmire F.M.
        • Franklin B.A.
        • Granger C.B.
        • Krumholz H.M.
        • Linderbaum J.A.
        • Morrow D.A.
        • Newby L.K.
        • Ornato J.P.
        • Ou N.
        • Radford M.J.
        • Tamis-Holland J.E.
        • Tommaso C.L.
        • Tracy C.M.
        • Woo Y.J.
        • Zhao D.X.
        • Anderson J.L.
        • Jacobs A.K.
        • Halperin J.L.
        • Albert N.M.
        • Brindis R.G.
        • Creager M.A.
        • DeMets D.
        • Guyton R.A.
        • Hochman J.S.
        • Kovacs R.J.
        • Kushner F.G.
        • Ohman E.M.
        • Stevenson W.G.
        • Yancy C.W.
        2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.
        Circulation. 2013; 127: e362-e425
        • Cannon C.P.
        • Braunwald E.
        • McCabe C.H.
        • Rader D.J.
        • Rouleau J.L.
        • Belder R.
        • Joyal S.V.
        • Hill K.A.
        • Pfeffer M.A.
        • Skene A.M.
        Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes.
        N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 1495-1504
        • Spencer F.A.
        • Goldberg R.J.
        • Gore J.M.
        • Fox K.A.
        • Avezum A.
        • Agnelli G.
        • Kritharides L.
        • Anderson F.A.
        • Goodman S.G.
        • FitzGerald G.
        • Allegrone J.
        • Brieger D.
        Comparison of utilization of statin therapy at hospital discharge and six-month outcomes in patients with an acute coronary syndrome and serum low-density lipoprotein>or=100 mg/dl versus<100 mg/dl.
        Am J Cardiol. 2007; 100: 913-918
        • Carroll M.D.
        • Kit B.
        • Lacher D.A.
        Total and High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
        2013 (Available at:) (Accessed on October 2013)
        • Dreyer N.A.
        • Tunis S.R.
        • Berger M.
        • Ollendorf D.
        • Mattox P.
        • Gliklich R.
        Why observational studies should be among the tools used in comparative effectiveness research.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2010; 29: 1818-1825
        • Martin S.S.
        • Blaha M.J.
        • Elshazly M.B.
        • Brinton E.A.
        • Toth P.P.
        • McEvoy J.W.
        • Joshi P.H.
        • Kulkarni K.R.
        • Mize P.D.
        • Kwiterovich P.O.
        • DeFilippis A.P.
        • Blumenthal R.S.
        • Jones S.R.
        Friedewald-estimated versus directly measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and treatment implications.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62: 732-739