Symptoms and Angiographic Findings of Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Angiography Without Prior Stress Testing

      Many patients undergo elective coronary angiography without preprocedural stress testing that may be suitable if performed in patients with more angina pectoris or more frequently identified obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry undergoing elective coronary angiography from July 2009 to April 2013 were assessed for differences in angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] class) and severity of obstructive CAD in those with and without preprocedural stress testing, stratified by CAD history. Given the large sample size, differences were considered clinically meaningful if the standardized difference (SD) was >10%. Of 790,601 patients without CAD history, 36.9% did not undergo preprocedural stress testing. Compared with patients with preprocedural stress testing, patients without preprocedural stress testing were more frequently angina free (CCS class 0; 28.2% with stress test vs 38.5% without, SD = 14.8%) and had similar rates of obstructive CAD (40.1% with stress test vs 35.7% without, SD = 9.0). Of 449,579 patients with CAD history, 44.2% did not undergo preprocedural stress testing. Patients without preprocedural stress testing reported more angina (CCS class III/IV angina: 17.8% vs 13.4%; SD = 11.3%) but were not more likely to have obstructive CAD (78.7% vs 81.1%; SD = 5.8%) than patients with preprocedural stress testing. In conclusion, approximately 40% of patients undergoing elective coronary angiography did not have preprocedural risk stratification with stress testing. For these patients, the clinical decision to proceed directly to invasive evaluation was not driven primarily by severe angina and did not result in higher detection rates for obstructive CAD.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment


      Subscribe to American Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Chan P.S.
        • Patel M.R.
        • Klein L.W.
        • Krone R.J.
        • Dehmer G.J.
        • Kennedy K.
        • Nallamothu B.K.
        • Weaver W.D.
        • Masoudi F.A.
        • Rumsfeld J.S.
        • Brindis R.G.
        • Spertus J.A.
        Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention.
        JAMA. 2011; 306: 53-61
        • Patel M.R.
        • Dehmer G.J.
        • Hirshfeld J.W.
        • Smith P.K.
        • Spertus J.A.
        ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization: a report by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 53: 530-553
        • Lin G.A.
        • Dudley R.A.
        • Lucas F.L.
        • Malenka D.J.
        • Vittinghoff E.
        • Redberg R.F.
        Frequency of stress testing to document ischemia prior to elective percutaneous coronary intervention.
        JAMA. 2008; 300: 1765-1773
        • Patel M.R.
        • Peterson E.D.
        • Dai D.
        • Brennan J.M.
        • Redberg R.F.
        • Anderson H.V.
        • Brindis R.G.
        • Douglas P.S.
        Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography.
        N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 886-895
        • Weintraub W.S.
        • McKay C.R.
        • Riner R.N.
        • Ellis S.G.
        • Frommer P.L.
        • Carmichael D.B.
        • Hammermeister K.E.
        • Effros M.N.
        • Bost J.E.
        • Bodycombe D.P.
        The American College of Cardiology National Database: progress and challenges. American College of Cardiology Database Committee.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 459-465
        • Brindis R.G.
        • Fitzgerald S.
        • Anderson H.V.
        • Shaw R.E.
        • Weintraub W.S.
        • Williams J.F.
        The American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR): building a national clinical data repository.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 2240-2245
        • Messenger J.C.
        • Ho K.K.
        • Young C.H.
        • Slattery L.E.
        • Draoui J.C.
        • Curtis J.P.
        • Dehmer G.J.
        • Grover F.L.
        • Mirro M.J.
        • Reynolds M.R.
        • Rokos I.C.
        • Spertus J.A.
        • Wang T.Y.
        • Winston S.A.
        • Rumsfeld J.S.
        • Masoudi F.A.
        The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Data Quality Brief: the NCDR Data Quality Program in 2012.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60: 1484-1488
        • Campeau L.
        Letter: Grading of angina pectoris.
        Circulation. 1976; 54: 522-523
        • Austin P.C.
        Using the standardized difference to compare the prevalence of a binary variable between two groups in observational research.
        Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2009; 38: 1228-1234
        • Smith Jr., S.C.
        • Feldman T.E.
        • Hirshfeld Jr., J.W.
        • Jacobs A.K.
        • Kern M.J.
        • King 3rd, S.B.
        • Morrison D.A.
        • O'Neill W.W.
        • Schaff H.V.
        • Whitlow P.L.
        • Williams D.O.
        • Antman E.M.
        • Adams C.D.
        • Anderson J.L.
        • Faxon D.P.
        • Fuster V.
        • Halperin J.L.
        • Hiratzka L.F.
        • Hunt S.A.
        • Nishimura R.
        • Ornato J.P.
        • Page R.L.
        • Riegel B.
        ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: e1-e121
        • Shaw L.J.
        • Hachamovitch R.
        • Berman D.S.
        • Marwick T.H.
        • Lauer M.S.
        • Heller G.V.
        • Iskandrian A.E.
        • Kesler K.L.
        • Travin M.I.
        • Lewin H.C.
        • Hendel R.C.
        • Borges-Neto S.
        • Miller D.D.
        The economic consequences of available diagnostic and prognostic strategies for the evaluation of stable angina patients: an observational assessment of the value of precatheterization ischemia. Economics of Noninvasive Diagnosis (END) Multicenter Study Group.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 33: 661-669
        • Kim C.
        • Kwok Y.S.
        • Saha S.
        • Redberg R.F.
        Diagnosis of suspected coronary artery disease in women: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
        Am Heart J. 1999; 137: 1019-1027
        • Hachamovitch R.
        • Hayes S.W.
        • Friedman J.D.
        • Cohen I.
        • Berman D.S.
        Stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography is clinically effective and cost effective in risk stratification of patients with a high likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) but no known CAD.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 200-208
        • Anderson H.V.
        • Shaw R.E.
        • Brindis R.G.
        • Klein L.W.
        • McKay C.R.
        • Kutcher M.A.
        • Krone R.J.
        • Wolk M.J.
        • Smith Jr., S.C.
        • Weintraub W.S.
        Relationship between procedure indications and outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions by American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force Guidelines.
        Circulation. 2005; 112: 2786-2791
        • Hannan E.L.
        • Cozzens K.
        • Samadashvili Z.
        • Walford G.
        • Jacobs A.K.
        • Holmes Jr., D.R.
        • Stamato N.J.
        • Sharma S.
        • Venditti F.J.
        • Fergus I.
        • King 3rd, S.B.
        Appropriateness of coronary revascularization for patients without acute coronary syndromes.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59: 1870-1876
        • Bradley S.M.
        • Chan P.S.
        • Spertus J.A.
        • Kennedy K.F.
        • Douglas P.S.
        • Patel M.R.
        • Anderson H.V.
        • Ting H.H.
        • Rumsfeld J.S.
        • Nallamothu B.K.
        Hospital percutaneous coronary intervention appropriateness and in-hospital procedural outcomes: insights from the NCDR.
        Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012; 5: 290-297