Advertisement

QRS Duration on Electrocardiography and Cardiovascular Mortality (from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey—III)

      The relation of bundle branch block (BBB) with adverse outcome is controversial. We hypothesized that increased QRS duration is an independent predictor of cardiovascular (CV) mortality in a cross-sectional US population. This is a retrospective cohort study on prospectively collected data to assess the relationship between QRS duration on routine ECG and CV mortality. Participants included 8,527 patients with ECG data available from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data set, representing 74,062,796 individuals in the United States. Mean age was 60.5 ± 13.6 years. Most subjects were white (87%) and women (53%). During the follow-up period of 106,244.6 person-years, 1,433 CV deaths occurred. Multivariate analysis revealed that the highest quartile of QRS duration was associated with higher CV mortality than lowest quartile (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 1.7, p = 0.04) after adjustment for established risk factors. Both left BBB (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.3 to 4.7, p = 0.009) and right BBB (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.0, p = 0.008) were significantly associated with increased CV mortality. The addition of the QRS duration in 10-millisecond increments to the Framingham Risk Score model resulted in 4.4% overall net reclassification improvement (95% CI 0.02 to 0.04; p = 0.00006). In conclusion, increased QRS duration was found to be an independent predictor of CV mortality in this cross-sectional US population. A model including QRS duration in addition to traditional risk factors was associated with improved CV risk prediction.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kashani A.
        • Barold S.S.
        Significance of QRS complex duration in patients with heart failure.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46: 2183-2192
        • Zimetbaum P.J.
        • Buxton A.E.
        • Batsford W.
        • Fisher J.D.
        • Hafley G.E.
        • Lee K.L.
        • O'Toole M.F.
        • Page R.L.
        • Reynolds M.
        • Josephson M.E.
        Electrocardiographic predictors of arrhythmic death and total mortality in the multicenter unsustained tachycardia trial.
        Circulation. 2004; 110: 766-769
        • Hesse B.
        • Diaz L.A.
        • Snader C.E.
        • Blackstone E.H.
        • Lauer M.S.
        Complete bundle branch block as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality: report of 7,073 patients referred for nuclear exercise testing.
        Am J Med. 2001; 110: 253-259
        • Eriksson P.
        • Hansson P.O.
        • Eriksson H.
        • Dellborg M.
        Bundle-branch block in a general male population: the study of men born 1913.
        Circulation. 1998; 98: 2494-2500
        • Rotman M.
        • Triebwasser J.H.
        A clinical and follow-up study of right and left bundle branch block.
        Circulation. 1975; 51: 477-484
        • Fahy G.J.
        • Pinski S.L.
        • Miller D.P.
        • McCabe N.
        • Pye C.
        • Walsh M.J.
        • Robinson K.
        Natural history of isolated bundle branch block.
        Am J Cardiol. 1996; 77: 1185-1190
      1. Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. US Department of Health and Human Services/National Center for Health Statistics, Atlanta, GA1996
      2. National Center for Health Statistics. Electrocardiography data file documentation of the NHANES-III, 1988–1994. Series 11, No. 2A. 1998. Available at: ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/nhanes/nhanes3/2A/NH3ECG-acc.pdf. Accessed on July 15, 2012.

      3. National Center for Health Statistics. Electrocardiogram manual of the NHANES-III, 1991. 1988–1994. Revised September 1991. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes3/cdrom/nchs/manuals/ecg.pdf. Accessed on February 15, 2012.

        • Rautaharju P.M.
        • MacInnis P.J.
        • Warren J.W.
        • Wolf H.K.
        • Rykers P.M.
        • Calhoun H.P.
        Methodology of ECG interpretation in the Dalhousie program; NOVACODE ECG classification procedures for clinical trials and population health surveys.
        Methods Inf Med. 1990; 29: 362-374
      4. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, 1988–1994 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Health and Human Services, National Center for Health Statistics [producer], 1996; Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1998.

      5. Plan and operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–94. Series 1: programs and collection procedures.
        Vital Health Stat 1. 1994; : 1-407
      6. Mohadjer L MJ, Waksberg J, Bell B, James P, Flores-Cervantes I, Montes M. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III: weighting and estimation methodology. 1996. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes3/cdrom/NCHS/MANUALS/WGT_EXEC.PDF.

        • Harrell F.
        Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis.
        Springer, New York2001
        • Pencina M.J.
        • D'Agostino Sr., R.B.
        • D'Agostino Jr., R.B.
        • Vasan R.S.
        Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.
        Stat Med. 2008; 27 (discussion 207–212): 157-172
        • Aro A.L.
        • Anttonen O.
        • Tikkanen J.T.
        • Junttila M.J.
        • Kerola T.
        • Rissanen H.A.
        • Reunanen A.
        • Huikuri H.V.
        Intraventricular conduction delay in a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram as a predictor of mortality in the general population.
        Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011; 4: 704-710
        • Kurl S.
        • Makikallio T.H.
        • Rautaharju P.
        • Kiviniemi V.
        • Laukkanen J.A.
        Duration of QRS complex in resting electrocardiogram is a predictor of sudden cardiac death in men.
        Circulation. 2012; 125: 2588-2594
        • Narayan S.M.
        T-wave alternans and the susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 269-281
        • Huikuri H.V.
        • Tapanainen J.M.
        • Lindgren K.
        • Raatikainen P.
        • Makikallio T.H.
        • Juhani Airaksinen K.E.
        • Myerburg R.J.
        Prediction of sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction in the beta-blocking era.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42: 652-658
        • Simson M.B.
        Use of signals in the terminal QRS complex to identify patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction.
        Circulation. 1981; 64: 235-242
        • Auer R.
        • Bauer D.C.
        • Marques-Vidal P.
        • Butler J.
        • Min L.J.
        • Cornuz J.
        • Satterfield S.
        • Newman A.B.
        • Vittinghoff E.
        • Rodondi N.
        Association of major and minor ECG abnormalities with coronary heart disease events.
        JAMA. 2012; 307: 1497-1505
        • Badheka A.
        • Patel N.
        • Tuliani T.A.
        • Rathod A.
        • Marzouka G.R.
        • Zalawadiya S.
        • Deshmukh A.
        • Moscucci M.
        • Cohen M.
        Electrocardiographic abnormalities and reclassification of cardiovascular risk: insights from NHANES-III.
        Am J Med. 2013; 126: 319-326
        • Eriksson P.
        • Wilhelmsen L.
        • Rosengren A.
        Bundle-branch block in middle-aged men: risk of complications and death over 28 years. The Primary Prevention Study in Goteborg, Sweden.
        Eur Heart J. 2005; 26: 2300-2306
        • Rabkin S.W.
        • Mathewson F.A.
        • Tate R.B.
        The natural history of right bundle branch block and frontal plane QRS axis in apparently healthy men.
        Chest. 1981; 80: 191-196
        • Bussink B.E.
        • Holst A.G.
        • Jespersen L.
        • Deckers J.W.
        • Jensen G.B.
        • Prescott E.
        Right bundle branch block: prevalence, risk factors, and outcome in the general population: results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study.
        Eur Heart J. 2013; 34: 138-146
        • Kors J.A.
        • Crow R.S.
        • Hannan P.J.
        • Rautaharju P.M.
        • Folsom A.R.
        Comparison of computer-assigned Minnesota Codes with the visual standard method for new coronary heart disease events.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 151: 790-797
        • Badheka A.O.
        • Rathod A.
        • Marzouka G.R.
        • Patel N.
        • Bokhari S.S.
        • Moscucci M.
        • Cohen M.G.
        Isolated Nonspecific ST-Segment and T-Wave Abnormalities in a Cross-Sectional United States Population and Mortality (from NHANES III).
        Am J Cardiol. 2012; 110: 521-525