Advertisement

Comparison of Need for Operative Therapy in Patients With Mitral Valve Prolapse Involving Both Leaflets Versus Posterior Leaflet Only

      Mitral valve prolapse may involve 1 leaflet or 2 leaflets, yet management guidelines do not differentiate posterior leaflet (PML) from bileaflet (BML) prolapse. We hypothesized that patients with BML have a prolonged natural history with more severe atrial and ventricular enlargement but less severe mitral regurgitation (MR) compared to patients with PML. Patients with mitral valve prolapse undergoing mitral repair were identified and preoperative characteristics were recorded. Patients with predominant PML prolapse (n = 304) versus BML prolapse (n = 131) were identified based on preoperative echocardiographic and intraoperative findings. Timing of operation was based on standard guidelines. Despite being equally symptomatic, patients with BML differed significantly from those with PML in being younger (54 vs 60 years, p <0.0001), more likely to be women (51% vs 24%, p <0.0001), and having a larger valve (37 vs 32 mm, p <0.0001). Despite similar cardiac function and dimensions, patients with BML had less severe MR (24% vs 13% with <4+ MR, p = 0.01) and less severe pulmonary hypertension (14% vs 31%, p <0.0001) at time of operation. In conclusion, patients with BML often meet indications for mitral valve repair with similar cardiac enlargement but less MR than patients with PML prolapse. Patients with BML prolapse may benefit from timing mitral repair based more on symptomatic 3+ MR or cardiac enlargement and less on presence of severe MR.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bonow R.O.
        • Carabello B.A.
        • Chatterjee K.
        • de Leon Jr, A.C.
        • Faxon D.P.
        • Freed M.D.
        • Gaasch W.H.
        • Lytle B.W.
        • Nishimura R.A.
        • O'Gara P.T.
        • O'Rourke R.A.
        • Otto C.M.
        • Shah P.M.
        • Shanewise J.S.
        • 2006 Writing Committee Members, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force
        2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease).
        Circulation. 2008; 118: e523-e661
        • Avierinos J.F.
        • Gersh B.J.
        • Melton L.J.
        • Bailey K.R.
        • Shub C.
        • Nishimura R.A.
        • Tajik A.J.
        • Enriquez-Sarano M.
        Natural history of asymptomatic mitral valve prolapse in the community.
        Circulation. 2002; 106: 1355-1361
        • Kang D.H.
        • Kim J.H.
        • Rim J.H.
        • Kim M.J.
        • Yun S.C.
        • Song J.M.
        • Song H.
        • Choi K.J.
        • Song J.K.
        • Lee J.W.
        Comparison of early surgery versus conventional treatment in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation.
        Circulation. 2009; 119: 797-804
        • Stevens L.M.
        • Rodriguez E.
        • Lehr E.J.
        • Kindell L.C.
        • Nifong L.W.
        • Ferguson T.B.
        • Chitwood Jr, W.R.
        Impact of timing and surgical approach on outcomes after mitral valve regurgitation operations.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2012; 93: 1462-1468
        • Samad Z.
        • Kaul P.
        • Shaw L.K.
        • Glower D.D.
        • Velazquez E.J.
        • Douglas P.S.
        • Jollis J.G.
        Impact of early surgery on survival of patients with severe mitral regurgitation.
        Heart. 2011; 97: 221-224
        • Matsumura T.
        • Ohtaki E.
        • Tanaka K.
        • Misu K.
        • Tobaru T.
        • Asano R.
        • Nagayama M.
        • Kitahara K.
        • Umemura J.
        • Sumiyoshi T.
        • Kasegawa H.
        • Hosoda S.
        Echocardiographic prediction of left ventricular dysfunction after mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation as an indicator to decide the optimal timing of repair.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42: 458-463
        • Seeburger J.
        • Borger M.A.
        • Doll N.
        • Walther T.
        • Passage J.
        • Falk V.
        • Mohr F.W.
        Comparison of outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery for posterior, anterior and bileaflet prolapse.
        Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009; 36: 532-538
        • Flameng W.
        • Meuris B.
        • Herijgers P.
        • Herregods M.C.
        Durability of mitral valve repair in Barlow disease versus fibroelastic deficiency.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008; 135: 274-282
        • David T.E.
        • Ivanov J.
        • Armstrong S.
        • Christie D.
        • Rakowski H.
        A comparison of outcomes of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease with posterior, anterior, and bileaflet prolapse.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005; 130: 1242-1249
        • Okada Y.
        • Nasu M.
        • Koyama T.
        • Shomura Y.
        • Yuzaki M.
        • Murashita T.
        • Fukunaga N.
        • Konishi Y.
        Outcomes of mitral valve repair for bileaflet prolapse.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 143: S21-S23
        • Chan V.
        • Ruel M.
        • Chaudry S.
        • Lambert S.
        • Mesana T.G.
        Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after repair of mitral valve bileaflet prolapse due to myxomatous disease.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 143: S8-S11