Significant variability in activated clotting time (ACT) measurement exists based
on the type of point-of-care system used. We sought to determine the degree of agreement
in ACT measurements by the Hemochron Response and the Hemochron Signature Elite Whole
Blood coagulation systems and whether these 2 systems can be used interchangeably.
We prospectively compared 126-paired samples in 77 patients undergoing percutaneous
coronary intervention. ACT was measured for each sample using the Hemochron Response
system with glass test tubes and the Hemochron Signature Elite system with low-range
ACT cuvettes simultaneously. We used correlation and Bland–Altman analyses. Mean age
of the study cohort was 67 ± 11 years, 49% were women, and 65% of measurements were
made after systemic anticoagulation. There was a significant correlation between the
Hemochron Response and Hemochron Signature Elite systems (r = 0.84, p <0.01). However,
the mean bias for the ACT measurement was 9 seconds (95% confidence interval −69 to
86). In the therapeutic range of ACT measurements, the mean bias was 15 seconds (95%
confidence interval −60 to 91). Thirty-three percent of total samples had >10% disagreement
and 8% of samples had >20% disagreement in the ACTs measured with the Hemochron Response
compared to the Hemochron Signature Elite. In conclusion, the Hemochron Response and
Hemochron Signature Elite ACT values cannot be used interchangeably. Institutions
using these 2 devices should be cognizant of this difference for ensuring patient
safety.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to American Journal of CardiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Comparison of Hemochron and HemoTec activated coagulation time target values during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 23: 907-910
- Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.Lancet. 1986; 1: 307-310
- Relation between procedural activated coagulation time and outcome after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 23: 1061-1065
- Relation between activated clotting time during angioplasty and abrupt closure.Circulation. 1996; 93: 667-671
- Defining the optimal activated clotting time during percutaneous coronary intervention: aggregate results from 6 randomized, controlled trials.Circulation. 2001; 103: 961-966
- 2007 Focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51: 172-209
Article info
Publication history
Published online: February 17, 2012
Accepted:
December 13,
2011
Received in revised form:
December 13,
2011
Received:
October 8,
2011
Identification
Copyright
© 2012 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.