Advertisement

Performance of Conventional Echocardiographic Parameters and Myocardial Measurements in the Sequential Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function

Published:January 03, 2008DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.10.037
      Echocardiography is frequently used for sequential evaluation of left ventricular (LV) function, although the reproducibility of such conventional measurements as LV ejection fraction (EF) have been questioned. The utility of such newer measurements as tissue Doppler imaging and left atrial (LA) size in serial clinical testing are undefined. The magnitude and clinical relevance of changes in conventional and new measurements of LV function were investigated and compared in 346 consecutive patients undergoing sequential echocardiography. Change in LA area, LVEF, tissue E velocity (Em), and transmitral E to Em ratio (E/Em) were compared over 304 ± 239 days. Changes within and between parameters (after mean correction to make measurements comparable) were assessed in groups designated as stable (n = 144) or unstable (n = 202) according to clinical progress. A single observer remeasured these parameters in stable patients individually and with paired studies side by side. Significant variability was seen in all measurements, with change in LVEF the only parameter differing between stable and unstable groups (6.4 ± 8.9% vs 9.4 ± 5.4%; p <0.001). Tissue Em and E/Em ratio were more variable than LA area or LVEF. In stable patients, LVEF changed the least and E/Em changed the most over time (p <0.05). With a single blinded observer, Em had improved reproducibility (1.5 ± 1.9 vs 2.3 ± 2.6 cm/s; p <0.001), as did visual EF. In conclusion, variability in all measurements was high irrespective of clinical status. Newer measurements were no better than LVEF in detecting changes in clinical status. Sequential LV assessment should be interpreted with caution, and more robust measurements are needed.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Gopal A.S.
        • Shen Z.
        • Sapin P.M.
        • Keller A.M.
        • Schnellbaecher M.J.
        • Leibowitz D.W.
        • Akinboboye O.O.
        • Rodney R.A.
        • Blood D.K.
        • King D.L.
        Assessment of cardiac function by three-dimensional echocardiography compared with conventional noninvasive methods.
        Circulation. 1995; 92: 842-853
        • Chuang M.L.
        • Hibberd M.G.
        • Salton C.J.
        • Beaudin R.A.
        • Riley M.F.
        • Parker R.A.
        • Douglas P.S.
        • Manning W.J.
        Importance of imaging method over imaging modality in noninvasive determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: assessment by two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 477-484
        • Lang R.M.
        • Bierig M.
        • Devereux R.B.
        • Flachskampf F.A.
        • Foster E.
        • Pellikka P.A.
        • Picard M.H.
        • Roman M.J.
        • Seward J.
        • Shanewise J.S.
        • et al.
        Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology.
        J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005; 18: 1440-1463
        • Mottram P.M.
        • Marwick T.H.
        Assessment of diastolic function: what the general cardiologist needs to know.
        Heart. 2005; 91: 681-695
        • Wang M.
        • Yip G.W.
        • Wang A.Y.
        • Zhang Y.
        • Ho P.Y.
        • Tse M.K.
        • Lam P.K.
        • Sanderson J.E.
        Peak early diastolic mitral annulus velocity by tissue Doppler imaging adds independent and incremental prognostic value.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 820-826
        • Moller J.E.
        • Hillis G.S.
        • Oh J.K.
        • Seward J.B.
        • Reeder G.S.
        • Wright R.S.
        • Park S.W.
        • Bailey K.R.
        • Pellikka P.A.
        Left atrial volume: a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction.
        Circulation. 2003; 107: 2207-2212
        • Hillis G.S.
        • Moller J.E.
        • Pellikka P.A.
        • Gersh B.J.
        • Wright R.S.
        • Ommen S.R.
        • Reeder G.S.
        • Oh J.K.
        Noninvasive estimation of left ventricular filling pressure by E/e’ is a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 360-367
        • Gottdiener J.S.
        • Panza J.A.
        • St. John Sutton M.
        • Bannon P.
        • Kushner H.
        • Weissman N.J.
        Testing the test: the reliability of echocardiography in the sequential assessment of valvular regurgitation.
        Am Heart J. 2002; 144: 115-121
        • Gottdiener J.S.
        • Livengood S.V.
        • Meyer P.S.
        • Chase G.A.
        Should echocardiography be performed to assess effects of antihypertensive therapy?.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25: 424-430
        • Wang T.J.
        • Evans J.C.
        • Benjamin E.J.
        • Levy D.
        • LeRoy E.C.
        • Vasan R.S.
        Natural history of asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the community.
        Circulation. 2003; 108: 977-982
        • St. John Sutton M.
        • Pfeffer M.A.
        • Moye L.
        • Plappert T.
        • Rouleau J.L.
        • Lamas G.
        • Rouleau J.
        • Parker J.O.
        • Arnold M.O.
        • Sussex B.
        • Braunwald E.
        Cardiovascular death and left ventricular remodeling two years after myocardial infarction: baseline predictors and impact of long-term use of captopril: information from the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) trial.
        Circulation. 1997; 96: 3294-3299
        • Otterstad J.E.
        • Froeland G.
        • St. John Sutton M.
        • Holme I.
        Accuracy and reproducibility of biplane two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular dimensions and function.
        Eur Heart J. 1997; 18: 507-513
        • Otterstad J.E.
        • St. John Sutton M.G.
        • Froeland G.S.
        • Holme I.
        • Skjaerpe T.
        • Hall C.
        Prognostic value of two-dimensional echocardiography and N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide following an acute myocardial infarction.
        Eur Heart J. 2002; 23: 1011-1020
        • Foster E.
        • Cahalan M.K.
        The search for intelligent quantitation in echocardiography: “eyeball,” “trackball” and beyond.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 22: 848-850
        • Shih T.
        • Lichtenberg R.
        • Jacobs W.
        Ejection fraction: subjective visual echocardiographic estimation versus radionuclide angiography.
        Echocardiography. 2003; 20: 225-230
        • Akinboboye O.
        • Sumner J.
        • Gopal A.
        • King D.
        • Shen Z.
        • Bardfeld P.
        • Blanz L.
        • Brown Jr, E.J.
        Visual estimation of ejection fraction by two-dimensional echocardiography: the learning curve.
        Clin Cardiol. 1995; 18: 726-729
        • Mele D.
        • Campana M.
        • Sclavo M.
        • Seveso G.
        • Aschieri D.
        • Nesta F.
        • D’Aiello I.
        • Ferrari R.
        • Levine R.A.
        Impact of tissue harmonic imaging in patients with distorted left ventricles: improvement in accuracy and reproducibility of visual, manual and automated echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction.
        Eur J Echocardiogr. 2003; 4: 59-67
        • Vinereanu D.
        • Khokhar A.
        • Fraser A.G.
        Reproducibility of pulsed wave tissue Doppler echocardiography.
        J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999; 12: 492-499
        • Abali G.
        • Tokgozoglu L.
        • Ozcebe O.I.
        • Aytemir K.
        • Nazli N.
        Which Doppler parameters are load independent?.
        J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005; 18: 1260-1265
        • Tsang T.S.
        • Barnes M.E.
        • Gersh B.J.
        • Bailey K.R.
        • Seward J.B.
        Left atrial volume as a morphophysiologic expression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and relation to cardiovascular risk burden.
        Am J Cardiol. 2002; 90: 1284-1289
        • Gardin J.M.
        • McClelland R.
        • Kitzman D.
        • Lima J.A.
        • Bommer W.
        • Klopfenstein H.S.
        • Wong N.D.
        • Smith V.E.
        • Gottdiener J.
        M-Mode echocardiographic predictors of six- to seven-year incidence of coronary heart disease, stroke, congestive heart failure, and mortality in an elderly cohort (the Cardiovascular Health Study).
        Am J Cardiol. 2001; 87: 1051-1057
        • Rodevan O.
        • Bjornerheim R.
        • Ljosland M.
        • Maehle J.
        • Smith H.J.
        • Ihlen H.
        Left atrial volumes assessed by three- and two-dimensional echocardiography compared to MRI estimates.
        Int J Card Imaging. 1999; 15: 397-410
        • Jenkins C.
        • Bricknell K.
        • Marwick T.H.
        Use of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography to measure left atrial volume: comparison with other echocardiographic techniques.
        J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005; 18: 991-997
        • Gottdiener J.S.
        Left atrial size: renewed interest in an old echocardiographic measurement.
        Am Heart J. 2004; 147: 195-196
        • Douglas P.S.
        • Khandheria B.
        • Stainback R.F.
        • Weissman N.J.
        • Brindis R.G.
        • Patel M.R.
        • Khandheria B.
        • Alpert J.S.
        • Fitzgerald D.
        • Heidenreich P.
        • et al.
        ACCF/ASE/ACEP/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2007 Appropriateness criteria for transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50: 187-204
        • Cheitlin M.
        • Armstrong W.
        • Aurigemma G.
        • Beller G.
        • Bierman F.
        • Davis J.
        • Douglas P.
        • Faxon D.
        • Gillam L.
        • Kimball T.
        • et al.
        ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography).
        2003 (Accessed on November 28, 2007)
        • Malm S.
        • Frigstad S.
        • Sagberg E.
        • Larsson H.
        • Skjaerpe T.
        Accurate and reproducible measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by contrast echocardiography: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 1030-1035
        • Hundley W.G.
        • Kizilbash A.M.
        • Afridi I.
        • Franco F.
        • Peshock R.M.
        • Grayburn P.A.
        Administration of an intravenous perfluorocarbon contrast agent improves echocardiographic determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32: 1426-1432
        • Nayyar S.
        • Magalski A.
        • Khumri T.M.
        • Idupulapati M.
        • Stoner C.N.
        • Kusnetzky L.L.
        • Coggins T.R.
        • Morris B.A.
        • Main M.L.
        Contrast administration reduces interobserver variability in determination of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and good baseline endocardial border delineation.
        Am J Cardiol. 2006; 98: 1110-1114