Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
- A randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon pumping after primary coronary angioplasty in high risk patients with acute myocardial infarction.Eur Heart J. 1999; 20: 659-665
- A prospective, randomized evaluation of prophylactic intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in high risk patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 1459-1467
- The effect of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation on left ventricular functional recovery early after acute myocardial infarction.Eur Heart J. 2005; 26: 1235-1241
- Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.Eur Heart J. 2005; 26: 1276-1283
- Elective versus provisional intra-aortic balloon pumping in high-risk percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.Am Heart J. 2003; 145: 700-707
- Percutaneous left ventricular assist device.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005; 65: 346-352
- The Impella Recover microaxial left ventricular assist device reduces mortality for postcardiotomy failure.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004; 127: 812-822
- Impella Recover 100.J Cardiovasc Surg. 2004; 45: 381-384
- Different applications for left ventricular mechanical support with the Impella Recover 100 microaxial blood pump.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005; 24: 481-485
- Initial experiences with the Impella device in patients with cardiogenic shock—Impella support for cardiogenic shock.Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003; 51: 312-317
- Left ventricular unloading and concomitant total cardiac output increase by the use of percutaneous Impella Recover LP 2.5 assist device during high-risk coronary intervention.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005; 65: 263-267