Advertisement

Standard versus user-interactive assessment of significant coronary stenoses with multislice computed tomography coronary angiography

      Forty-four patients in sinus rhythm with suspected coronary artery disease underwent 16-row multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional coronary angiography. Two protocols for image analysis were applied to the multislice computed tomographic images: standard projections versus interactive postprocessing. The diagnostic accuracy of both methods for the detection of significant lesions (>50% lumen reduction) was compared with quantitative coronary angiography. Sensitivity and specificity were 58% and 96% and 96% and 97%, for standard projections and interactive postprocessing protocol, respectively.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Nieman K.
        • Cademartiri F.
        • Lemos P.A.
        • Raaijmakers R.
        • Pattynama P.M.
        • de Feyter P.J.
        Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography.
        Circulation. 2002; 106: 2051-2054
        • Ropers D.
        • Baum U.
        • Pohle K.
        • Anders K.
        • Ulzheimer S.
        • Ohnesorge B.
        • Schlundt C.
        • Bautz W.
        • Daniel W.G.
        • Achenbach S.
        Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction.
        Circulation. 2003; 107: 664-666
        • Austen W.G.
        • Edwards J.E.
        • Frye R.L.
        • Gensini G.G.
        • Gott V.L.
        • Griffith L.S.
        • McGoon D.C.
        • Murphy M.L.
        • Roe B.B.
        A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease.
        Circulation. 1975; 51: 5-40
        • Hawass N.E.
        Comparing the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic procedures performed on the same group of patients.
        Br J Radiol. 1997; 70: 360-366