Advertisement

Usefulness of QT dispersion immediately after exercise as an indicator of coronary stenosis independent of gender or exercise-induced ST-segment depression

      Abstract

      Several recent studies suggest that QT dispersion on a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram is a clinically useful indicator of significant coronary stenosis. In this study, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of QT dispersion immediately after exercise as an indicator of coronary stenosis in men and women, and in the presence or absence of exercise-induced significant ST-segment depression. The subjects were 273 consecutive patients (mean age 56 ± 9 years; 190 men and 83 women) without a history of myocardial infarction who underwent treadmill exercise electrocardiography and coronary angiography for evaluation of angina. Of these, 146 patients had no significant coronary stenosis, 61 had single-vessel disease, 56 had multivessel disease, and 10 had left main coronary artery disease. QT dispersion immediately after exercise was significantly greater in patients with significant coronary stenosis than in those without (64 ± 14 vs 39 ± 14 ms, p <0.01). QT dispersion immediately after exercise was significantly more sensitive in men (sensitivity 75%; specificity 85%) and significantly more specific in women (sensitivity 77%, specificity 88%) than exercise-induced significant ST-segment depression (men: sensitivity 62%, specificity 74%; women: sensitivity 81%, specificity 68%) as an indicator of significant coronary stenosis. The addition of factors such as gender and the presence or absence of exercise-induced significant ST-segment depression did not significantly alter the sensitivity and specificity of QT dispersion immediately after exercise for detecting significant coronary stenosis (patients with significant ST-segment depression: sensitivity 77%, specificity 88%; patients without significant ST-segment depression: sensitivity 72%, specificity 86%). In conclusion, QT dispersion immediately after exercise is a clinically useful indicator of significant coronary stenosis independent of gender or the presence or absence of exercise-induced significant ST-segment depression.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Borer J.S
        • Brensike J.F
        • Redwood D.R
        • Itscoitz S.B
        • Passamani E.R
        • Stone N.J
        • Richardson J.M
        • Levy R.I
        • Epstein S.E
        Limitation of the electrocardiographic response to exercise in predicting coronary artery disease.
        N Engl J Med. 1975; 293: 367-371
        • Goldschlager N
        • Selzer A
        • Cohn K
        Treadmill stress tests as indicators of presence and severity of coronary disease.
        Ann Int Med. 1976; 85: 277-286
        • Gianrossi R
        • Detrano R
        • Mulvhilli D
        • Lehmann K
        • Dubach P
        • Colombo A
        • McArthur D
        • Froelicher V
        Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of the coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis.
        Circulation. 1989; 80: 87-98
        • Lachterman B
        • Lehmann K.G
        • Detrano R
        • Neutel J
        • Froelicher V.F
        Comparison of ST segment/heart rate index to standard ST criteria for analysis of exercise electrocardiogram.
        Circulation. 1990; 82: 44-50
        • Sato I
        • Keta K
        • Aihara N
        • Ohe T
        • Shimomura K
        • Hasegawa Y
        Improved accuracy of the exercise electrocardiogram in detection of coronary artery and three-vessel coronary disease.
        Chest. 1988; 94: 737-744
        • Nademanee K
        • Christenson P.D
        • Intarachot V
        • Robertson H.A
        • Mody F.V
        Variability of indexes for myocardial ischemia.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989; 13: 574-579
        • Ellestad M.H
        • Savitz S
        • Bergdall D
        • Teske J
        The false-positive stress test.
        Am J Cardiol. 1977; 40: 681-685
        • Detry J.M.R
        • Kapita B.M
        • Cosyns J
        • Sottiaux B
        • Brasser L.A
        • Rousseau M.F
        Diagnostic value of history and maximal exercise electrocardiography in men and women suspected of coronary artery disease.
        Circulation. 1977; 56: 756-761
        • Weiner D.A
        • Ryan T.J
        • McCabe C.H
        • Kenedy J.W
        • Schloss M
        • Tristani F
        • Chaitman B.R
        • Fisher L.D
        Exercise stress testing correlation among history of angina, ST-segment response and prevalence of coronary artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS).
        N Engl J Med. 1979; 301: 230-235
        • Cummings G.R
        • Dufresne C
        • Kich L
        • Sann J
        Exercise electrocardiogram patterns in normal women.
        Br Heart J. 1973; 35: 1055-1061
        • Guiteras P
        • Chaitman B.R
        • Waters D.D
        • Bourassa M.G
        • Scholl J.M
        • Ferguson R.J
        • Wagniart P
        Diagnostic accuracy of exercise ECG lead systems in clinical subsets of women.
        Circulation. 1982; 65: 1465-1474
        • Han J
        • Moc G.K
        Nonuniform recovery of excitability in ventricular muscle.
        Circ Res. 1964; 14: 342-344
        • Kuo C.S
        • Munakata K
        • Reddy C.P
        • Surawicz B
        Characteristics and possible mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmia dependent on the dispersion of action potential durations.
        Circulation. 1983; 67: 1356-1367
        • Day C.P
        • McComb J.M
        • Campbell R.W.F
        QT dispersion.
        Br Heart J. 1990; 63: 342-344
        • Buja G
        • Miorelli M
        • Melacini P
        • Nava A
        Comparison of QT dispersion in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy between patients with and without ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death.
        Am J Cardiol. 1993; 72: 973-976
        • Pye M
        • Quinn A.C
        • Cobbe S.M
        QT interval dispersion.
        Br Heart J. 1994; 71: 511-514
        • Stoletniy L.N
        • Pai R.G
        Value of QT dispersion in the interpretation of exercise stress test in women.
        Circulation. 1997; 96: 904-910
        • Sporton S.C
        • Taggart P
        • Sutton P.M
        • Walker J.M
        • Hardman S.M
        Acute ischemia.
        Lancet. 1997; 349: 306-309
        • Stierle U
        • Giannitsis E
        • Sheikhzadeh A
        • Kruger D
        • Schmucker G
        • Mitusch R
        • Potratz J
        Relation between QT dispersion and the extent of myocardial ischemia in patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease.
        Am J Cardiol. 1998; 81: 564-568
        • Teragawa H
        • Hirao H
        • Muraoka Y
        • Yamagata T
        • Matsuura H
        • Kajiyama G
        Relation between QT dispersion and adenosine triphosphate stress thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging for detecting myocardial ischemia and scar.
        Am J Cardiol. 1999; 83: 1152-1156
        • Koide Y
        • Yotsukura M
        • Yoshino H
        • Ishikawa K
        Value of QT dispersion in the interpretation of treadmill exercise electrocardiograms of patients without exercise-induced chest pain or ST-segment depression.
        Am J Cardiol. 2000; 85: 1094-1099
        • Callif R.M
        • Mark D.B
        • Harrell F.E
        • Hlatky M.A
        • Lee K.L
        • Rosati R.A
        • Pryor D.B
        Importance of clinical measures of ischemia in the prognosis of patients with documented coronary artery disease.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988; 11: 20-26
        • Hanley J.A
        • McNeil B.J
        A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.
        Radiology. 1983; 148: 839-843
        • Bland J.M
        • Altman D.G
        Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.
        Lancet. 1986; 1: 307-310
        • Higham P.D
        • Furniss S.S
        • Campbell R.W
        QT dispersion and components of the QT interval in ischaemia and infarction.
        Br Heart J. 1995; 73: 32-36
        • Moreno F.L
        • Villaneuva M.T
        • Karagounis L.A
        • Anderson J.L
        Reduction in QT interval dispersion by successful thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction.
        Circulation. 1994; 90: 94-100
        • Mirvis D.M
        Spatial variation of QT intervals in normal persons and patients with acute myocardial infarction.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985; 5: 625-631
        • van de Loo A
        • Arendts W
        • Hohnloser S.H
        Variability of QT dispersion measurements in the surface electrocardiogram in patients with acute myocardial infarction and in normal subjects.
        Am J Cardiol. 1994; 74: 1113-1118
        • Kautzner J
        • YI G
        • Gamm A.J
        • Malik M
        Short- and long-term reproducibility of QT, QTc, and QT dispersion measurement in healthy subjects.
        PACE. 1994; 17: 928-937
        • Savelieva I
        • Yi G
        • Guo X
        • Hnatkova K
        • Malik M
        Agreement and reproducibility of automatic versus manual measurement of QT interval and QT dispersion.
        Am J Cardiol. 1998; 81: 471-477