Advertisement

Importance of lead selection in QT interval measurement

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      The influence of lead selection on QT estimation in the 12-lead electrocardiogram was assessed in 63 patients (21 control subjects, 21 with anterior myocardial infarction, 21 with inferior myocardial infarction). QT estimates varied between leads. The variation was greater in patients with myocardial infarction than in control subjects (mean dispersion of QT: control subjects, 48 ± 18 ms [± standard deviation]; anterior myocardial infarction, 70 ± 30 ms; inferior myocardial infarction, 73 ± 32 ms). The maximum QT in any lead (QTmax) was determined and the deviation of each lead from this maximum value calculated. In all 3 groups, anteroseptal leads (V2 or V3) provided the closest approximation to QTmax. Interlead variability was found to be mainly due to variation in timing of the end of the T wave, rather than the onset of the QRS complex. The variability due to leads was considerably greater than the variability due to cycles, observers or measurement error. Implementation of a variety of current lead selection practices resulted in widely divergent estimates of QT interval. It is concluded that there is a need for standardization of lead selection practice for QT measurement. If measurements are confined to one or a few leads, anteroseptal leads provide the closest approximation to QTmax.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Surawicz B
        • Knoebel SB
        Long QT: good, bad or indifferent?.
        JACC. 1984; 4: 398-413
        • Schwartz PJ
        Idiopathic long QT syndrome: progress and questions.
        Am Heart J. 1984; 109: 399-411
        • Lepeschkin E
        • Surawicz B
        The measurement of the QT interval of the electrocardiogram.
        Circulation. 1952; 6: 378-388
        • Ahnve S
        Errors in the visual determination of corrected QT (QTc) interval during myocardial infarction.
        JACC. 1985; 5: 699-702
        • Hedman A
        • Nordlander R
        • Pehrsson SK
        Changes in Q-T and Q-aT intervals at rest and during exercise with different modes of cardiac pacing.
        PACE. 1985; 8: 825-831
        • Sylven JC
        • Horacek BM
        • Spencer A
        • Klassen GA
        • Montague TJ
        QT interval variability on the body surface.
        J Electrocardiol. 1984; 17: 179-188
        • Mirvis DM
        Spatial variation of QT intervals in normal persons and patients with acute myocardial infarction.
        JACC. 1985; 3: 625-631
        • Moller M
        QT interval in relation to ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in postmyocardial infarction patients.
        Acta Med Scand. 1981; 210: 73-77
        • Wheelan K
        • Mukharji J
        • Rude RE
        • Poole WK
        • Gustafson N
        • Thomas LJ
        • Strauss HW
        • Jaffe AS
        • Muller JE
        • Roberts R
        • Croft CH
        • Passamani ER
        • Willerson JT
        • MILIS Study Group
        Sudden death and its relation to QT-interval prolongation after acute myocardial infarction: two-year follow-up.
        Am J Cardiol. 1986; 57: 745-750
        • Ahnve S
        • Gilpin E
        • Madsen EB
        • Froelicher V
        • Henning H
        • Ross J
        Prognostic importance of QTc interval at discharge after acute myocardial infarction: a multicentre study of 865 patients.
        Am Heart J. 1984; 108: 395-400
        • Juul-Moller S
        Corrected QT interval during one year follow-up after an acute myocardial infarction.
        Eur Heart J. 1986; 7: 299-304
        • Schwartz PJ
        • Wolf S
        QT interval prolongation as predictor of sudden death in patients with myocardial infarction.
        Circulation. 1978; 57: 1074-1077
        • Bazett HC
        An analysis of the time-relations of electrocardiograms.
        Heart. 1920; 7: 353-370
        • Campbell RWF
        • Gardiner P
        • Amos PA
        • Chadwick P
        • Jordan RS
        Measurement of the QT interval.
        Eur Heart J. 1985; 6: 81-83