Exercise in patients with heart disease

Effects of body position and type and intensity of exercise
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. Beiser, G. D., Epstein, S. E., Stampfer, M. and Braunwald, E. The circulatory response to exercise of patients with impaired cardiac function: Effects of body position and type of exercise. In preparation.

        • Bevegärd S.
        • Holmgren A.
        • Jonsson B.
        The effect of body position on the circulation at rest and during exercise, with special reference to the influence on the stroke volume.
        Acta physiol. scandinav. 1960; 49: 279
        • McGregor M.
        • Adam W.
        • Sekelj P.
        Influence of posture on cardiac output and minute ventilation during exercise.
        Circulation Res. 1961; 9: 1089
        • Epstein S.E.
        • Beiser G.D.
        • Stampfer M.
        • Robinson B.F.
        • Braunwald E.
        Characterization of the circulatory response to maximal upright exercise in normal subjects and patients with heart disease.
        Circulation. 1967; 35: 1049
        • Reeves J.T.
        • Grover R.F.
        • Blount Jr., S.G.
        • Filley G.F.
        Cardiac output response to standing and treadmill walking.
        J. Appl. Physiol. 1961; 16: 283
        • Damato A.N.
        • Galante J.G.
        • Smith W.M.
        Hemodynamic response to treadmill exercise in normal subjects.
        J. Appl. Physiol. 1966; 21: 959