Diagnosis of the anatomic types of congenital dextrocardia

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Van Praagh R.
        • Van Praagh S.
        • Vlad P.
        • Keith J.D.
        Anatomic types of congenital dextrocardia. Diagnostic and embryologic implications.
        Am. J. Cardiol. 1964; 13: 510
        • Portillo B.
        • Anselmi G.
        • Sodi-Pallares D.
        • Medrano G.A.
        Importance of the unipolar leads in the diagnosis of dextrocardias, levocardias, dextropositions, and dextrorotations.
        Am. Heart J. 1959; 57: 396
        • Arcilla R.A.
        • Gasul B.M.
        Congenital dextrocardia. Clinical, angiocardiographic and autopsy studies on 50 patients.
        J. Pediat. 1961; 58: 39
        • Caffey J.
        Pediatrie X-Ray Diagnosis.
        in: Year Book Publishers, Inc, Chicago1945: 229
        • Sodi-Pallares D.
        • Bisteni A.
        • Fishleder B.L.
        • Medrano G.A.
        Importance of the unipolar morphologies in the interpretation of the electrocardiogram: The theoretical basis of the unipolar morphologies and its correlation with vectorial analysis, with cardiac activation and with the potential variations at the epicardial surface of the heart.
        Am. Heart J. 1959; 57: 590
        • De La Cruz M.V.
        • Polansky B.J.
        • Navarrolópez F.
        The diagnosis of corrected transposition of the great vessels.
        Brit. Heart J. 1962; 24: 483
        • Van Praagh R.
        • Ongley P.A.
        • Swan H.J.C.
        Anatomic types of single or common ventricle in man: Morphologic and geometric aspects of 60 necropsied cases.
        Am. J. Cardiol. 1964; 13: 367
        • Malers E.
        • Björk V.O.
        • Cullhed J.
        • Lodin H.
        Transposition functionally totally corrected, associated with “mitral” insufficiency.
        Am. Heart J. 1960; 59: 816
        • Sodi-Pallares D.
        • Bisteni A.
        • Herrmann G.R.
        Some views on the significance of qR and qR type complexes in the right precordial leads in the absence of myocardial infarction.
        Am. Heart J. 1952; 43: 716
        • Walmsley T.
        Transposition of the ventricles and the arterial stems.
        J. Anat. 1931; 65: 528
        • Anderson R.C.
        • Lillehei C.W.
        • Lester R.G.
        Corrected transposition of the great vessels of the heart. A review of 17 cases.
        Pediatrics. 1957; 20: 626
        • Schiebler G.L.
        • et al.
        Congenital corrected transposition of the great vessels: A study of 33 cases.
        Pediatrics. 1961; 27: 851
        • Grant R.P.
        The morphogenesis of transposition of the great vessels.
        Circulation. 1962; 26: 819
        • Ivemark B.
        Implications of agenesis of the spleen on the pathogenesis of conotruncal anomalies in childhood.
        Acta pediat. 1955;
        • Freireich A.W.
        • Nicolson G.B.
        A rare electrocardiographic finding occasionally seen in single ventricle hearts.
        Am. Heart J. 1952; 43: 526
      1. Van Praagh, R., Van Praagh, S., Vlad, P. and Keith, J. D. Diagnosis of the anatomic types of single (common) ventricle. Am. J. Cardiol., in press.

        • Abbott M.E.
        Atlas of Congenital Cardiac Disease.
        in: The American Heart Association, New York1936: 58
        • Ayres S.M.
        • Steinberg I.
        Dextrorotation of the heart. An angiocardiographic study of fortyone cases.
        Circulation. 1963; 27: 268