American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 106, Issue 3 , Pages 310-315, 1 August 2010

Dipyridamole Stress and Rest Myocardial Perfusion by 64-Detector Row Computed Tomography in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

  • Roberto C. Cury, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular MR and CT Section, University of São Paulo Medical, School, São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • Tiago A. Magalhães, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular MR and CT Section, University of São Paulo Medical, School, São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • Anna C. Borges, MD

      Affiliations

    • Nuclear Imaging Section, University of São Paulo Medical, School, São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • Afonso A. Shiozaki, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular MR and CT Section, University of São Paulo Medical, School, São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • Pedro A. Lemos, MD

      Affiliations

    • Invasive Cardiology Section, Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical, School, São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • José Soares Júnior, MD

      Affiliations

    • Nuclear Imaging Section, University of São Paulo Medical, School, São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • José Cláudio Meneghetti, MD

      Affiliations

    • Nuclear Imaging Section, University of São Paulo Medical, School, São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • Ricardo C. Cury, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular MR and CT Program, Baptist Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Florida
    • Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Carlos E. Rochitte, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular MR and CT Section, University of São Paulo Medical, School, São Paulo, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel/fax: 55-11-3069-5587

Received 11 November 2009; received in revised form 4 March 2010; accepted 4 March 2010.

Recently, stress myocardial computed tomographic perfusion (CTP) was shown to detect myocardial ischemia. Our main objective was to evaluate the feasibility of dipyridamole stress CTP and compare it to single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to detect significant coronary stenosis using invasive conventional coronary angiography (CCA; stenosis >70%) as the reference method. Thirty-six patients (62 ± 8 years old, 20 men) with previous positive results with SPECT (<2 months) as the primary inclusion criterion and suspected coronary artery disease underwent a customized multidetector-row CT protocol with myocardial perfusion evaluation at rest and during stress and coronary CT angiography (CTA). Multidetector-row computed tomography was performed in a 64-slice scanner with dipyridamole stress perfusion acquisition before a second perfusion/CT angiographic acquisition at rest. Independent blinded observers performed analysis of images from CTP, CTA, and CCA. All 36 patients completed the CT protocol with no adverse events (mean radiation dose 14.7 ± 3.0 mSv) and with interpretable scans. CTP results were positive in 27 of 36 patients (75%). From the 9 (25%) disagreements, 6 patients had normal coronary arteries and 2 had no significant stenosis (8 false-positive results with SPECT, 22%). The remaining patient had an occluded artery with collateral flow confirmed by conventional coronary angiogram. Good agreement was demonstrated between CTP and SPECT on a per-patient analysis (kappa 0.53). In 26 patients using CCA as reference, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 88.0%, 79.3%, 66.7%, and 93.3% for CTP and 68.8, 76.1%, 66.7%, and 77.8%, for SPECT, respectively (p = NS). In conclusion, dipyridamole CT myocardial perfusion at rest and during stress is feasible and results are similar to single-photon emission CT scintigraphy. The anatomical-perfusion information provided by this combined CT protocol may allow identification of false-positive results by SPECT.

 

 This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid 2007/56214-8 from the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo/Brazil, and the Zerbini Foundation, São Paulo/Brazil.

PII: S0002-9149(10)00774-5

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.03.025

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 106, Issue 3 , Pages 310-315, 1 August 2010