American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 105, Issue 5 , Pages 677-680, 1 March 2010

Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Exercise-Induced Right Bundle Branch Block

  • Ricardo Stein, MD

      Affiliations

    • Exercise Pathophysiology Research Laboratory, Cardiology Division, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
    • Veteran Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
  • ,
  • Patricia Nguyen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Veteran Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: (650) 815-8151; fax: (650) 852-3473
  • ,
  • Joshua Abella, MD

      Affiliations

    • Veteran Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
  • ,
  • Harold Olson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Veteran Affairs Long Beach Health Care System, San Diego, California
  • ,
  • Jonathan Myers, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Veteran Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
  • ,
  • Victor Froelicher, MD

      Affiliations

    • Veteran Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

Received 10 August 2009; received in revised form 25 October 2009; accepted 25 October 2009.

Exercise-induced (EI) right bundle branch block (RBBB) is an infrequent electrocardiographic phenomenon, and controversy exists regarding its association with cardiovascular disease. We compared the prevalence and prognostic significance of RBBB, abnormal ST depression, and normal electrocardiographic findings in response to exercise testing in 9,623 consecutive veterans who underwent exercise testing from 1987 to 2007. EI RBBB, EI ST depression, and a normal exercise electrocardiographic response occurred in 0.24%, 15.2%, and 71.9% veterans, respectively. After appropriate exclusions, of the 8,047 patients analyzed, 6 patients in the EI RBBB subgroup died. Of these 6 deaths, 3 were cardiovascular deaths during the 9 years of follow-up. The annual death rate was 7.3% (1.4% cardiac deaths), 2.6% (1.2% cardiac deaths), and 1.8% (0.6% cardiac death) among those with EI RBBB, EI ST depression, and a normal ST response, respectively (p <0.0001). The patients with EI RBBB were significantly older, more overweight, and had a greater prevalence of coronary artery disease, heart failure, and hypertension compared to the 2 other subgroups. Patients with EI RBBB had an age-adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratio of 1.13 (p = 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 2.5) for all-cause mortality and 1.57 (p = 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 4.8) for cardiovascular mortality, respectively. In conclusion, EI RBBB is a rare occurrence during routine clinical exercise testing that appears to be benign.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by a grant from CNPq (Brasília, Brazil).

PII: S0002-9149(09)02593-4

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.10.050

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 105, Issue 5 , Pages 677-680, 1 March 2010