American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 105, Issue 5 , Pages 687-693, 1 March 2010

The RecordAF Study: Design, Baseline Data, and Profile of Patients According to Chosen Treatment Strategy for Atrial Fibrillation

  • Jean-Yves Le Heuzey, MD

      Affiliations

    • Hôpital Georges Pompidou–APHP, University Paris V, Paris, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: +33 (1) 56 09 3701; fax: +33 (1) 56 09 3047
  • ,
  • Günter Breithardt, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
  • ,
  • John Camm, MD

      Affiliations

    • St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Harry Crijns, MD

      Affiliations

    • Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Paul Dorian, MD

      Affiliations

    • St. Michaels's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Peter R. Kowey, MD

      Affiliations

    • Lankenau Hospital, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • Ihsen Merioua, MD

      Affiliations

    • sanofi-aventis, Paris, France
  • ,
  • Eric N. Prystowsky, MD

      Affiliations

    • St. Vincent Hospital and Health Center Program, Indianapolis, Indiana
  • ,
  • Peter J. Schwartz, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Pavia and IRCCS, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
  • ,
  • Christian Torp-Pedersen, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Copenhagen and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
  • ,
  • William Weintraub, MD

      Affiliations

    • Christiana Center for Outcomes Research, Newark, Delaware

Received 16 July 2009; received in revised form 14 October 2009; accepted 14 October 2009. published online 10 December 2009.

The REgistry on Cardiac rhythm disORDers assessing the control of Atrial Fibrillation (RecordAF) is the first worldwide, 1-year observational, longitudinal study of the management of paroxysmal/persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in recently diagnosed patients. The study was conducted at 532 sites in 21 countries across Europe, America, and Asia; recruitment was completed in April 2008. The primary objectives were to prospectively assess the therapeutic success and clinical outcomes in rhythm- and rate-control strategies. The study design and patient baseline data are reported. A total of 5,814 patients with AF were registered, and 5,604 were eligible for evaluation. Rhythm- and rate-control strategies were applied to 55% and 45% of patients, respectively, at study inclusion. Rhythm-control patients mainly received class III agents (45%) or β blockers (51%), except for sotalol, and rate-control patients mainly received β blockers (72%), except for sotalol, or cardiac glycosides (34%). Patients receiving a rhythm-control strategy were younger, had a lower resting heart rate, were more frequently symptomatic, and were more likely to have recently diagnosed AF or paroxysmal AF compared to patients receiving a rate-control strategy. A rate-control strategy was more common in patients with a history of heart failure or valvular heart disease and persistent AF. Rate-control patients more often had previous electrocardiographic evidence of AF and were not in sinus rhythm at inclusion (p <0.01 for both end points). Patients were followed at 6 and 12 months, and changes in therapeutic strategy and clinical outcomes were recorded. In conclusion, the RecordAF study results will provide a global perspective on current AF treatment strategies.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The registry was funded by sanofi-aventis, Paris, France; and editorial support was funded by sanofi-aventis.

PII: S0002-9149(09)02487-4

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.10.012

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 105, Issue 5 , Pages 687-693, 1 March 2010