« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 105, Issue 3
, Pages 302-305
, 1 February 2010
Diagnostic Accuracy of 64-Slice Multislice Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography in Patients With an Intermediate Pretest Likelihood for Coronary Artery Disease
References
- . Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2324–2336
- . Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:145–148
- . Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1724–1732
- . Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:2135–2144
- . 64-Multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:3042–3050
- . 64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2008;94:1386–1393
- . Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:62–70
- . Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1979;300:1350–1358
- . A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease (Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association). Circulation. 1975;51:5–40
- . 64-Slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1469–1475
- . Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2354–2360
- . Costs and clinical outcomes after coronary multidetector CT angiography in patients without known coronary artery disease: comparison to myocardial perfusion SPECT. Radiology. 2008;249:62–70
- . Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation. 2006;113:1305–1310
- . Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys. 2006;33:4236–4248
- . Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:191–197
- . Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;24:535–546
- . Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:3037–3042
- . Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. Heart. 2008;94:1132–1137
Dr. van Werkhoven was financially supported by a research grant from the Netherlands Society of Cardiology (Utrecht, The Netherlands); Dr. Boogers was supported by grant 2006T102 from the Dutch Heart Foundation (The Hague, The Netherlands); Dr. Bax received research grants from Medtronic (Tolochenaz, Switzerland), Boston Scientific (Maastricht, The Netherlands), BMS Medical Imaging (North Billerica, Massachusetts), Biotronik (Berlin, Germany), St. Jude Medical (Veenendaal, The Netherlands), GE Healthcare (St. Giles, United Kingdom), and Edwards Lifesciences (Saint-Prex, Switzerland).
PII: S0002-9149(09)02400-X
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.09.029
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 105, Issue 3
, Pages 302-305
, 1 February 2010
