American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 105, Issue 1 , Pages 82-86, 1 January 2010

Predictors of Short-Term (Seven-Day) Cardiac Outcomes After Emergency Department Visit for Syncope

  • Gelareh Z. Gabayan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
    • Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: 310-968-0668; fax: 310-740-7600
  • ,
  • Stephen F. Derose, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Research and Evaluation, Kasier Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California
  • ,
  • Steven M. Asch, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
  • ,
  • Vicki Y. Chiu, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Research and Evaluation, Kasier Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California
  • ,
  • Sungching C. Glenn, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Research and Evaluation, Kasier Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California
  • ,
  • Carol M. Mangione, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
  • ,
  • Benjamin C. Sun, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
    • Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California

Received 3 July 2007; received in revised form 7 August 2007; accepted 7 August 2007.

Syncope is a common reason for emergency department (ED) visits, and patients are often admitted to exclude syncope of cardiovascular origin. Population-based data on patterns and predictors of cardiac outcomes may improve decision-making. Our objective was to identify patterns and predictors of short-term cardiac outcomes in ED patients with syncope. Administrative data from an integrated health system of 11 Southern California EDs were used to identify cardiac outcomes after ED presentation for syncope from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2005. Syncope and cause of death were identified by codes from the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision. Cardiac outcomes included cardiac death and hospitalization or procedure consistent with ischemic heart disease, valvular disease, or arrhythmia. Predictors of cardiac outcomes were identified through multivariate logistic regression. There were 35,330 adult subjects who accounted for 39,943 ED visits for syncope. Risk of cardiac outcome sharply decreased following the 7 days after syncope. A 7-day cardiac outcome occurred in 893 cases (3%). Positive predictors of 7-day cardiac outcomes included age ≥60 years, male gender, congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, cardiac arrhythmia, and valvular heart disease. Negative predictors included dementia, pacemaker, coronary revascularization, and cerebrovascular disease. There was an age-dependent relation between 7-day cardiac outcomes and arrhythmia and valvular disease, with younger patients (<60 years of age) having greater risk of an event compared to their same-age counterparts. In conclusion, ED decision-making should focus on risk of cardiac event in the first 7 days after syncope and special attention should be given to younger patients with cardiac co-morbidities.

 

 Dr. Gabayan is supported by a Greater Los Angeles Veteran's Affairs Health Services Research and Development Fellowship, Los Angeles, California. This research was also supported by Grant 20051687 to Dr. Sun from the American Geriatrics Society New York, New York Dennis Jahnigen Career Development Award and Grant AG 01-004 to Dr. Sun from the University of California, Los Angeles, National Institutes of Aging K12 Mentored Clinical Scientist Development Program in Geriatrics, Los Angeles, California. Dr. Sun also received support from the UCLA Older Americans Independence Center, NIH/NIA Grant P30-AG028748, and the content does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Aging or the National Institutes of Health.

PII: S0002-9149(09)02219-X

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.08.654

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 105, Issue 1 , Pages 82-86, 1 January 2010