American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 105, Issue 1 , Pages 25-28, 1 January 2010

Prognosis After Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction During Mental Stress Testing in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease

  • Michael A. Babyak, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: 919-684-3828; fax: 919-684-8629
  • ,
  • James A. Blumenthal, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Alan Hinderliter, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Benson Hoffman, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Robert A. Waugh, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • ,
  • R. Edward Coleman, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Andrew Sherwood, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Received 20 May 2009; received in revised form 7 August 2009; accepted 7 August 2009. published online 16 November 2009.

Previous studies of patients with stable coronary artery disease have demonstrated that decreases in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during acute mental stress are predictive of adverse clinical outcomes. The aim of the present study was to examine the prospective relation of mental stress on clinical outcomes in a sample of 138 patients with stable coronary artery disease. Patients underwent mental stress testing and were followed for a median of 5.9 years to assess the occurrence of the combined end point of myocardial infarction or all-cause mortality. There were 32 events (17 nonfatal myocardial infarctions and 15 deaths) over the follow-up period. Of the 26 patients who exhibited myocardial ischemia during mental stress testing, 11 (42%) sustained subsequent clinical events, compared to 21 of the 112 patients (19%) who showed no mental stress–induced ischemia. LVEF change during mental stress was also related to the clinical events in a graded, continuous fashion, with each 4% decrease from the LVEF at rest associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.7, (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.6, p = 0.011). In conclusion, reductions in the LVEF during mental stress are prospectively associated with adverse clinical outcomes.

 

 This study was supported by Grants HL59672 and M01-RR-30 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

PII: S0002-9149(09)02212-7

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.08.647

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 105, Issue 1 , Pages 25-28, 1 January 2010