American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 104, Issue 10 , Pages 1362-1369, 15 November 2009

Clinical Outcomes After Sirolimus-Eluting, Paclitaxel-Eluting, and Bare Metal Stents (from the First Phase of the Prospective Multicenter German DES.DE Registry)

  • Christoph A. Nienaber, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: (+49) 0-381-494-7700; fax: (+49) 0-381-494-7702
  • ,
  • Ibrahim Akin, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
  • ,
  • Steffen Schneider, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany
  • ,
  • Jochen Senges, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany
  • ,
  • Thomas Fetsch, MD

      Affiliations

    • Institut für klinische-kardiovaskuläre Forschung, München, Germany
  • ,
  • Ulrich Tebbe, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Klinikum Lippe-Detmold, Detmold, Germany
  • ,
  • Stefan N. Willich, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charite Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • Jürgen Stumpf, MD

      Affiliations

    • Gemeinschaftspraxis Kardiologie und Angiologie, Dresden, Germany
  • ,
  • Georg V. Sabin, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Essen, Essen, Germany
  • ,
  • Sigmund Silber, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Kardiologische Gemeinschaftspraxis München, München, Germany
  • ,
  • Gert Richardt, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Segeberger-Klinikum, Segeberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Karl-Heinz Kuck, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Asklepios-Klinikum, Hamburg, Germany
  • ,
  • DES.DE Study Group

Received 10 May 2009; received in revised form 28 June 2009; accepted 28 June 2009. published online 28 September 2009.

The prospective multicenter German Drug-Eluting Stent (DES.DE) registry is an observational study to analyze and evaluate the therapeutic principle of the differential drug-eluting stents (sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents) and bare metal stents under real world conditions in the context of the German healthcare system. The baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics and follow-up events for 1 year were recorded for all enrolled patients. In addition, a health economics assessment was performed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after initial stent placement. The composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke, defined as major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and target vessel revascularization were used as the primary objectives. From October 2005 to October 2006, 6,384 patients were enrolled (sirolimus-eluting stents, n = 2,137; paclitaxel-eluting stents, n = 2,740; bare metal stents, n = 485) at 98 Deutsches Drug-Eluting Stent Register sites. With similar baseline clinical and descriptive morphology of coronary artery disease between both drug-eluting stent groups, no differences were present at 1 year of follow-up in the rates of overall mortality (3.8% vs 4.1%), target vessel revascularization (10.4% vs 10.4%), overall stent thrombosis (3.6% vs 3.8%), and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (8.1% vs 8.0%). Compared with the bare metal stent group, patients treated with drug-eluting stents had significantly lower rates of myocardial infarction (3.2% vs 6.0%; p <0.01), stroke (1.2% vs 2.7%; p <0.05), and target vessel revascularization (10.4% vs 14.9%; p <0.01) without any difference in the stent thrombosis rate (3.7% vs 4.3%; p = 0.57) or mortality rate (4.0% vs 5.2%; p = 0.21). In conclusion, the data generated from the German Drug-Eluting Stent registry revealed no differences between patients receiving a paclitaxel-eluting stent and sirolimus-eluting stent in a “real-world” setting with regard to the clinical outcomes at 1 year.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9149(09)01321-6

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.06.058

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 104, Issue 10 , Pages 1362-1369, 15 November 2009