American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 104, Issue 3 , Pages 327-332, 1 August 2009

Usefulness of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock from Acute Myocardial Infarction

  • Jin M. Cheng, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Suzanne D.A. Valk, MD

      Affiliations

    • Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Corstiaan A. den Uil, MD

      Affiliations

    • Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: (+31) 10-703-5019; fax: (+31) 10-703-2890
  • ,
  • Martin van der Ent, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Wim K. Lagrand, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Meike van de Sande, MD

      Affiliations

    • Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Ron T. van Domburg, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Maarten L. Simoons, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Received 28 January 2009; received in revised form 24 March 2009; accepted 24 March 2009. published online 05 June 2009.

Although intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation is increasingly being used for the treatment of patients with cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction, data on the long-term outcomes are lacking. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the 30-day and long-term mortality and to identify predictors for 30-day and long-term all-cause mortality of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock who were treated with IABP. From January 1990 to June 2004, 300 consecutive patients treated with IABP were included. The mean age of the study population was 61 ± 11 years, and 79% of the patients were men. The survival rate until IABP removal after successful hemodynamic stabilization was 70% (n = 211). The overall cumulative 30-day survival rate was 58%. The 30-day mortality rate decreased over time from 52% in 1990 to 1994 to 36% in 2000 to 2004 (p for trend <0.05). Follow-up ranged from 0 to 15 years. In patients who survived until IABP removal, the cumulative 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rate was 69%, 58%, and 36%, respectively. The adjusted predictors of long-term mortality were arrhythmias during the intensive cardiac care unit stay (hazard ratio [HR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 2.9) and renal failure during the intensive cardiac care unit stay (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 5.1). After adjustment, treatment with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.9) and coronary artery bypass grafting (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.8) were associated with lower long-term mortality. In conclusion, in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock treated with IABP, the 30-day survival improved with time and an encouraging number of patients survived in the long term.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9149(09)00812-1

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.03.050

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 104, Issue 3 , Pages 327-332, 1 August 2009