American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 104, Issue 2 , Pages 194-198, 15 July 2009

Usefulness of Combining Serum Uric Acid and C-Reactive Protein for Risk Stratification of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention [BIP] Study)

  • Yafim Brodov, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Heart Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • ,
  • Shlomo Behar, MD

      Affiliations

    • Neufeld Cardiac Research Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • ,
  • Ilan Goldenberg, MD

      Affiliations

    • Heart Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • ,
  • Valentina Boyko, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Neufeld Cardiac Research Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • ,
  • Pierre Chouraqui, MD

      Affiliations

    • Heart Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: 972-3-530-2109; fax: 972-3-535-3441

published online 05 May 2009.

Combined assessment of serum uric acid (UA) and C-reactive protein (CRP) compared with single-marker evaluation in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) was performed. CRP is an independent predictor of cardiac events in patients with or without CAD. Data regarding the prognostic value of UA in patients with CAD are conflicting. The primary end point (fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction or sudden cardiac death) was related to levels of UA and CRP in 2,966 patients with CAD enrolled in the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention trial who were followed for a mean period of 6.2 years. Primary end-point rates were directly related to increasing tertiles (from tertile 1 [T1] to tertile 3 [T3]) of UA (12.7%, 12.8%, and 17.6% respectively, p for trend <0.0001) and CRP (11.5%, 14.2%, and 17.3% respectively, p for trend <0.002). By multivariable analysis, T3 UA (>6.25 mg/dl) and T3 CRP (>5.37 mg/dl) were shown to be independently associated with a significant increase in risk for the primary end point (hazard ratio 1.30, 1.01 to 1.68, p = 0.04; hazard ratio 1.31, 1.02 to 1.69, p = 0.03, respectively). Primary end-point rates were similarly high in those patients with a combination of T3 UA and T1 CRP levels (hazard ratio 1.68, 1.05 to 2.66) or a combination of T3 CRP and T1 serum UA levels (hazard ratio 1.64, 1.04 to 2.58) or in patients with T3 of the 2 markers (hazard ratio 1.66, 1.07 to 2.59). In conclusion, combined assessment of UA and CRP levels provides incremental information for risk stratification of patients with CAD with low levels of a single marker.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9149(09)00721-8

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.03.017

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 104, Issue 2 , Pages 194-198, 15 July 2009