American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 103, Issue 11 , Pages 1518-1524, 1 June 2009

Association Between Mortality and Persistent Use of Beta Blockers and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction and Coronary Artery Disease

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Received 4 December 2008; received in revised form 31 January 2009; accepted 31 January 2009. published online 10 April 2009.

Beta blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs/ARBs) are evidence-based medications for chronic heart failure, but little is known about the persistent use and clinical effectiveness of these medications. We evaluated the longer-term use of β blockers and ACEIs/ARBs in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and coronary artery disease. Patients with an ejection fraction <40% and coronary artery disease who had a cardiac catheterization from April 1994 through December 2005 were identified. Long-term patterns of β-blocker and ACEI/ARB use were categorized as persistent, new, previous, or no use based on information from routine follow-up surveys. Characteristics among medication-use groups were explored, and survival associated with persistent use was determined. Of 3,187 patients identified for the β-blocker analysis, 1,339 (42.0%) had persistent use. Conditional on surviving for ≥2 follow-up surveys, the adjusted risk of death was statistically significantly lower with persistent use versus no use (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65 to 0.82) and new use versus no use (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.97). Adjusted risk of death was not statistically significantly different between persistent or new use of an evidence-based β blocker and persistent use of a nonevidence-based β blocker (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.17). Of 3,166 patients identified for the ACEI/ARB analysis, 1,347 (42.5%) had persistent use. There was no statistically significant association between adjusted mortality and persistent use (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.05), new use (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.03), or previous use (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.07) compared with no ACEI/ARB use. In conclusion, persistent and new use of β blockers was associated with survival, but evidence-based β blockers did not appear superior to nonevidence-based β blockers. We were unable to demonstrate a statistically significant association between persistent ACEI/ARB use and survival.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported in part by Grant U18HS10548 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Maryland.

PII: S0002-9149(09)00531-1

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.363

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 103, Issue 11 , Pages 1518-1524, 1 June 2009