« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 103, Issue 7
, Pages 943-949
, 1 April 2009
Usefulness of Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Guiding Clinical Decisions in Intermediate or Equivocal Left Main Coronary Stenoses
References
- . Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1703–1708
- . Fractional flow reserve: critical review of an important physiologic adjunct to angiography. Am Heart J. 2004;147:792–802
- . Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation. 2001;103:2928–2934
- . Long-term follow-up after deferral of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of intermediate stenosis on the basis of coronary pressure measurement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:841–847
- . One-year outcome of patients submitted to routine fractional flow reserve assessment to determine the need for angioplasty. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:2623–2629
- Usefulness of fractional flow reserve measurements in patients with stable or unstable angina pectoris, non–ST-elevation and ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction or atypical chest pain. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:289–297
- . Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;42:2105–2111
- . Value of fractional flow reserve in making decisions about bypass surgery for equivocal left main coronary artery disease. Heart. 2001;86:547–552
- . Clinical outcome in patients with intermediate or equivocal left main coronary artery disease after deferral of surgical revascularization on the basis of fractional flow reserve measurements. Am Heart J. 2006;152:156.e1–156.e9
- . Should we treat patients with moderately severe stenosis of the left main coronary artery and negative FFR results?. J Inv Cardiol. 2004;16:398–400
- . Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation. 2004;110:2831–2836
- . Adequacy of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurements. Am Heart J. 2000;140:651–657
- Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation. 2006;114:1321–1341
- . Are high doses of intracoronary adenosine an alternative to standard intravenous adenosine for the assessment of fractional flow reserve?. Am Heart J. 2004;148:590–595
- . Comparison of medical treatment and coronary revascularization in patients with moderate coronary lesions and borderline fractional flow reserve measurements. Catheter Cardiovasc Intervent. 2008;71:541–548
- . One-year follow-up after intravascular ultrasound assessment of moderate left main coronary artery disease in patients with ambiguous angiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:707–715
- . Effect of diabetes on progression of coronary atherosclerosis and arterial remodeling: a pooled analysis of 5 intravascular ultrasound trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:255–262
- . Impact of individual and cumulative coronary risk factors on coronary flow reserve assessed by dobutamine stress echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:1694–1699
- . Role of chronic hyperglycemia in the pathogenesis of coronary microvascular dysfunction in diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1387–1393
- . Adequate intracoronary adenosine doses to achieve maximal hyperemia in coronary functional studies by pressure derived fractional flow reserve: a dose response study. Heart. 2004;90:95–96
PII: S0002-9149(08)02179-6
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.11.054
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 103, Issue 7
, Pages 943-949
, 1 April 2009
