Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 103, Issue 7, Pages 943-949 (1 April 2009)


View previous. 10 of 32 View next.

Usefulness of Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Guiding Clinical Decisions in Intermediate or Equivocal Left Main Coronary Stenoses

Javier Courtis, MD, Josep Rodés-Cabau, MDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Eric Larose, MD, Jean-Michel Potvin, MD, Jean-Pierre Déry, MD, Robert De Larochellière, MD, Mélanie Côté, MSc, Olivier Cousterousse, PhD, Can M. Nguyen, MD, Guy Proulx, MD, Stéphane Rinfret, MD, Olivier F. Bertrand, MD, PhD

Received 27 August 2008; received in revised form 21 November 2008; accepted 21 November 2008. published online 09 February 2009.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the usefulness of fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements to guide the clinical decision in patients with intermediate left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis and to determine the predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE)—cardiac death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization—in such cases; 142 consecutive patients with intermediate LMCA stenosis (mean percent diameter stenosis 42 ± 13%) were included. All patients underwent FFR measurement after intracoronary administration of adenosine at a dose ≥30 μg. The clinical decisions were based on FFR as follows: coronary revascularization was recommended if FFR was <0.75, medical treatment if FFR was >0.80, and individualized decision based on additional clinical data if FFR was between 0.75 and 0.80. Mean FFR was 0.81 ± 0.09 after the administration of 176 ± 99 μg of adenosine. Based on FFR results, 60 patients (42%) underwent coronary revascularization, and 82 patients (58%) received medical treatment. At 14 ± 11 months follow-up, the incidence of MACE related to the LMCA stenosis was 13% in the medical treatment group and 7% in the revascularization group (p = 0.27). The incidence of cardiac death or myocardial infarction was 6% in the medical treatment group and 7% in the revascularization group (p = 0.70). In the medical treatment group, with MACE had received a lower dose of intracoronary adenosine (86 ± 57 vs 167 ± 102 μg; odds ratio 1.39 for each decrease of 30 μg of intracoronary adenosine, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.89) and more frequently had diabetes (55% vs 21%; odds ratio 4.40, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 16.42). In conclusion, FFR measurement is helpful in guiding the decision whether to revascularize patients with intermediate LMCA stenosis. However, patients with diabetes remain at higher risk, and higher doses than previously recommended of intracoronary adenosine might have to be used in the evaluation of LMCA stenosis.

Interventional Cardiology Laboratories, Quebec Heart Institute-Laval Hospital, Quebec, Canada

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: 418-656-8711; fax: 418-656-4544

PII: S0002-9149(08)02179-6

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.11.054


View previous. 10 of 32 View next.