American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 103, Issue 6 , Pages 852-856, 15 March 2009

Usefulness of Intra-Operative Epicardial Three-Dimensional Echocardiography to Guide Aortic Valve Repair in Children

  • Vladimiro L. Vida, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiac Surgery, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Renè Hoehn, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Luis Alesandro Larrazabal, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Kimberlee Gauvreau, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Gerald R. Marx, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Pedro J. del Nido, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiac Surgery, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: 617-355-8290; fax: 617-730-0214

Received 7 August 2008; received in revised form 13 November 2008; accepted 13 November 2008. published online 27 January 2009.

The aim of this study was to determine the additional important information obtained on prebypass epicardial 3-dimensional imaging (E-3D) compared with transesophageal 2-dimensional echocardiography (TEE-2D) in young patients who undergoing aortic valve repair. From January 2004 to May 2007, all patients who underwent reconstructive surgery of the native aortic valve and intraoperative TEE-2D and E-3D were retrospectively reviewed. Thirteen structural anatomic variables of the aortic valve for TEE-2D and E-3D were evaluated, scored, and compared (by a blinded observer) with intraoperative surgical findings. Nineteen patients underwent valve repair. The median age at surgery was 10 years (range 1 day to 24 years). The primary aortic valve disease was regurgitation (n = 19), and 2 patients had additional valvar stenosis. TEE-2D and E-3D were able to detect 82% (n = 204) and 91% (n = 225), respectively, of the intraoperative findings (n = 247) (p = 0.006). Individual evaluation scores were higher for E-3D (median 12, interquartile range 11 to 13) than for TEE-2D (median 11, interquartile range 10 to 12) (p = 0.01) compared with surgical findings (score 13). Differences in detection sensitivity occurred for commissural fusion (n = 7), leaflet perforation or deficiency (n = 5), and leaflet prolapse (n = 2). TEE-2D was more likely to have false-negative findings than E-3D (36 vs 16 findings, p = 0.001). In conclusion, intraoperative E-3D provides additional important information over TEE-2D for aortic valve repair in young patients. Such 3-dimensional echocardiographic imaging has become an important intraoperative modality for valve repair at the investigators' institution.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9149(08)02119-X

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.11.043

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 103, Issue 6 , Pages 852-856, 15 March 2009