American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 102, Issue 9, Supplement , Pages 29J-37J, 3 November 2008

Drug-Eluting Stents and Antiplatelet Resistance

  • Daniel I. Simon, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Daniel I. Simon, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
  • ,
  • Joseph Jozic, MD

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Resistance to the antiplatelet effects of both aspirin and clopidogrel is common and is associated with poorer clinical outcomes in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy. Available data indicate that hyporesponsiveness to clopidogrel is overcome in some patients by increasing the loading dose from 300 mg to 600 mg, with the higher loading dose being associated with reduced risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Recent studies in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation indicate that antiplatelet resistance is associated with increased risk of stent thrombosis. A study in 804 patients receiving drug-eluting stents showed that nonresponse (defined as >70% aggregation at 10 μmol/L adenosine diphosphate) after a clopidogrel 600-mg loading dose was associated with a significantly increased risk of stent thrombosis (8.6% vs 2.3% for nonresponders vs responders, respectively) and cardiovascular death at 6 months. Another study in 380 patients showed that high posttreatment platelet reactivity (top tertile of values) on a rapid assay was associated with significantly greater out-of-hospital 6-month rates of stent thrombosis (4.0% vs 0.4% for high posttreatment reactivity group vs low posttreatment reactivity group, respectively), cardiovascular death, and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Further studies are needed to provide standardized definitions of antiplatelet resistance to better correlate resistance with clinical outcomes in patients receiving stents and to identify treatment alternatives in patients with resistance.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Statement of author disclosure: Please see the Author Disclosures section at the end of this article.

PII: S0002-9149(08)01496-3

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.09.007

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 102, Issue 9, Supplement , Pages 29J-37J, 3 November 2008