American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 102, Issue 9, Supplement , Pages 24J-28J, 3 November 2008

Drug-Eluting Stents in the Real World: How Intravascular Ultrasound Can Improve Clinical Outcome

Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy, Presbyterian Hospital of the Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA

Although the benefits of drug-eluting stents for the treatment of native coronary lesions in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions have been demonstrated in multiple clinical trials, there remains concern about the risk of late stent thrombosis. The MATRIX registry, a prospective study designed to reflect clinical conditions, has enrolled a varied population of complex patients who have received the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and long-term dual antiplatelet therapy. Contributing to the low rate of stent thrombosis and other complications after SES deployment in this study is the routine use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging before and after implantation at a high rate (38%). Important technical considerations for the IVUS operator include stent expansion, residual edge stenosis, and malapposition. Ensuring adequate stent dimensions and wall contact can contribute to successful outcomes in patients receiving SES.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Statement of author disclosure: Please see the Author Disclosures section at the end of this article.

PII: S0002-9149(08)01495-1

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.09.006

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 102, Issue 9, Supplement , Pages 24J-28J, 3 November 2008