American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 102, Issue 10 , Pages 1407-1412, 15 November 2008

Age and Double Product (Systolic Blood Pressure × Heart Rate) Reserve-Adjusted Modification of the Duke Treadmill Score Nomogram in Men

  • Amir H. Sadrzadeh Rafie, MD

      Affiliations

    • Stanford University School Medicine, Stanford, California
  • ,
  • Frederick E. Dewey, MD

      Affiliations

    • Stanford University School Medicine, Stanford, California
  • ,
  • Gannon W. Sungar, BA

      Affiliations

    • Stanford University School Medicine, Stanford, California
  • ,
  • Euan A. Ashley, MRCP, DPhil

      Affiliations

    • Stanford University School Medicine, Stanford, California
  • ,
  • David Hadley, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiac Science, Bothell, Washington
  • ,
  • Jonathan Myers, PhD

      Affiliations

    • VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
  • ,
  • Victor F. Froelicher, MD

      Affiliations

    • VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: 650-493-5000, ext. 64605; fax: 650 849 0298

Received 6 June 2008; received in revised form 13 July 2008; accepted 13 July 2008. published online 15 September 2008.

The Duke Treadmill Score (DTS) is an established clinical tool for risk stratification. Our aim was to determine if other variables could improve the prognostic power of the DTS and if so, to modify the DTS nomogram. From a total of 1,959 patients referred for exercise testing at the Palo Alto VA Medical Center from 1997 to 2006 (a mean follow-up of 5.4 years), we studied 1,759 male veterans (age 57 ± 12 years) free of heart failure. Double product (DP) was calculated by multiplying systolic blood pressure and heart rate; variables and their products were subtracted to obtain the differences between at rest and maximal exercise (reserve) and recovery. Of all the hemodynamic measurements, DP reserve was the strongest predictor of cardiovascular death (CVD) (Wald Z-score −3.84, p <0.001) after adjustment for potential confounders. When the components of DTS were entered in the Cox hazard model with DP reserve and age, only DP reserve and age were chosen (p <0.00001). Using the Cox coefficients, a score calculated by [age − DTS – 3 × (DP reserve/1,000)] yielded an area under the curve of 0.84 compared with 0.76 for the DTS. Using this equation, a nomogram was constructed by adding age and DP reserve to the original DTS nomogram improving estimation of annual CVD. In conclusion, we propose an age and DP reserve-adjusted DTS nomogram that improves the prognostic estimates of average annual CVD over the DTS alone.

 

PII: S0002-9149(08)01237-X

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.07.020

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 102, Issue 10 , Pages 1407-1412, 15 November 2008