« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 102, Issue 8
, Pages 957-965
, 15 October 2008
Impact of Body Mass Index and Waist-to-Hip Ratio on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction (from the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry)
References
- Clinical safety of drug-eluting stents in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry. Circ J. 2008;72:392–398
- . Appropriate body mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363:157–163
- Obesity and the risk of myocardial infarction in 27000 participants from 52 countries: a case–control study. Lancet. 2005;366:1640–1649
- . Clinical implications of the new definition of myocardial infarction. Heart. 2004;90:99–106
- . The prognosis of heart failure in the general population: the Rotterdam study. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:1318–1327
- . The obesity paradox: fact or fiction?. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:944–948
- Impact of body mass index on outcomes after primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2006;151:168–175
- . The obesity paradox in non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the can rapid risk stratification of unstable angina patients suppress adverse outcomes with early implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines quality improvement initiative. Am Heart J. 2006;152:140–148
- . Impact of body mass index on outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (the obesity paradox). Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:42–45
- . The obesity paradox: body mass index and outcomes in patients with heart failure. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:55–61
- . An obesity paradox in acute heart failure: analysis of body mass index and inhospital mortality for 108927 patients in the acute decompensated heart failure national registry. Am Heart J. 2007;153:74–81
- . Impact of obesity on disease-specific health status after percutaneous coronary intervention in coronary disease patients. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:1011–1017
- . Medical therapies and invasive treatments for coronary artery disease by body mass: the “obesity paradox” in Get With The Guideline database. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1331–1335
- . Comparison of the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta blockers on survival in elderly patients with reduced left ventricular function after myocardial infarction. Am J Med. 2001;110:425–433
- . Impact of body mass index on in-hospital outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (report from the New York State Angioplasty Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:1229–1232
- . Weight change after myocardial infarction—the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease patients (ENRICHD) experience. Am Heart J. 2008;155:478–484
- . Relation of body mass index to outcome in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:1485–1490
- . Association with weight loss and subsequent mortality risk. Ann Epidemiol. 2005;15:483–491
- . Association of bodyweight with total mortality and with cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease: a systematic review of cohort studies. Lancet. 2006;368:666–678
- . Decreased muscle mass and increased central adiposity are independently related to mortality in older men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86:1339–1346
- . Prognostic impact of body weight and abdominal obesity in women and men with cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J. 2005;149:54–60
- . Waist circumference, visceral obesity, and cardiovascular risk. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2003;23:161–169
- . The impact of obesity on the short-term and long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: the obesity paradox?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:578–584
- . Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case–control study. Lancet. 2004;364:937–952
This study was performed with the support of the Korean Circulation Society in honor of its 50th anniversary.
PII: S0002-9149(08)01009-6
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.06.022
© 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 102, Issue 8
, Pages 957-965
, 15 October 2008
