American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 102, Issue 8 , Pages 970-974, 15 October 2008

Comparison of Peripheral Arterial Response to Mental Stress in Men Versus Women With Coronary Artery Disease

  • Mustafa Hassan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Research, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
    • North Florida/South Georgia VA Healthcare System, Gainesville, Florida
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: 352-376-1611; fax: 352-271-4537
  • ,
  • Qin Li, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
  • ,
  • Babette Brumback, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
  • ,
  • Dorian G. Lucey, BA

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Research, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
    • North Florida/South Georgia VA Healthcare System, Gainesville, Florida
  • ,
  • Melinda Bestland, RN

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Research, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
    • North Florida/South Georgia VA Healthcare System, Gainesville, Florida
  • ,
  • Gina Eubanks, BS

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Research, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
    • North Florida/South Georgia VA Healthcare System, Gainesville, Florida
  • ,
  • Roger B. Fillingim, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Community Dentistry and Behavioral Science, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
  • ,
  • David S. Sheps, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Research, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
    • North Florida/South Georgia VA Healthcare System, Gainesville, Florida

Received 11 March 2008; received in revised form 2 June 2008; accepted 2 June 2008. published online 28 July 2008.

Article Outline

There are profound gender-related differences in the incidence, presentation, and outcomes of coronary artery disease (CAD). These differences are not entirely explained by traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Nontraditional risk factors, such as psychological traits, have increasingly been recognized as important contributors to the genesis and outcomes of CAD. Mental stress induces significant peripheral arterial vasoconstriction, with consequent increases in heart rate and blood pressure. These changes are thought to underlie the development of myocardial ischemia and other mental stress–induced adverse cardiac events in patients with CAD. This study examined for gender-related differences in peripheral arterial response to mental stress in a cohort of patients with CAD using a novel peripheral arterial tonometric (PAT) technique. There were 211 patients (77 women; 37%) with a documented history of CAD and a mean age of 64 ± 9 years. Patients were enrolled from August 18, 2004, to February 21, 2007. Mental stress was induced using a public speaking task. Hemodynamic and PAT measurements were recorded during rest and mental stress. The PAT response was calculated as a ratio of pulse wave amplitude during stress to at rest. PAT responses were compared between men and women. The PAT ratio (during stress to at rest) was significantly higher in women compared with men. Mean PAT ratio was 0.80 ± 0.72 in women compared with 0.59 ± 0.48 in men (p = 0.032). This finding remained significant after controlling for possible confounding factors (p = 0.037). In conclusion, peripheral vasoconstrictive response to mental stress was more pronounced in men compared with women. This finding may suggest that men have higher susceptibility to mental stress–related adverse effects. Additional studies are needed to determine the significance of this finding.

 

Little has been reported regarding gender-related differences in mental stress–induced vascular reactivity. However, there is consistent evidence that women have decreased sensitivity to the vasoconstrictor effects of norepinephrine.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Women have also been shown to have higher basal nitric oxide compared with men.7, 8 Collectively, these observations suggest that men may have more intense vascular reactivity to mental stress compared with women. In patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), these changes may increase vulnerability to mental stress–induced myocardial ischemia and other mental stress–related adverse events.9, 10, 11, 12 In this study, we sought to examine for gender-related differences in peripheral arterial response to mental stress in a cohort of patients with CAD using a novel noninvasive peripheral arterial tonometric (PAT) technique.

Back to Article Outline

Methods 

Subjects in this study were recruited from outpatient clinics affiliated with university-based medical centers. Eligibility criteria included age >18 years and a documented clinical diagnosis of CAD supported by (1) angiographic evidence of >50% stenosis in ≥1 coronary artery or previous percutaneous intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery; (2) previous myocardial infarction (MI) documented with increased troponin in the range typical of MI, Q-wave abnormalities on electrocardiogram, or fixed perfusion abnormalities on nuclear scan; or (3) a positive radionuclide pharmacologic or exercise stress test result. Patients were excluded if they had unstable angina or acute MI within the 2 months preceding enrollment, a severe co-morbid medical problem restricting life-expectancy to <5 years, pregnancy, or body weight >400 lbs.

Study procedures were performed the morning after an overnight fast. Beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, and long-acting nitrates were withheld the night before testing. Demographic and psychosocial characteristics were obtained before study procedures. Patients were initially rested for 30 minutes in a temperature-controlled (21°C to 23°C) dark and quiet room. Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were measured every 5 minutes using an electrocardiograph monitor and automatic oscillometric device (Dinamap; Critikon Inc., Tampa, Florida), respectively. Mental stress was then induced through a public speaking task performed in front of a small white-coated audience, as in previous research.13 Subjects were given a scenario describing a real-life stressful event and asked to make up a realistic story around it. Subjects were given 2 minutes to prepare their speech and 3 minutes to speak. They were told that their speech would be videotaped and the laboratory staff would replay the tape to rate it for content, quality, and duration of the speech. Hemodynamic measurements were obtained every minute during the preparation and speech periods and at 1, 3, 5, and 10 minutes into the recovery period. Systolic BP and HR were used to calculate the double product value (double product = systolic BP × HR).

The PAT device (Itamar-Medical, Caesarea, Israel) was used to continuously measure pulse wave amplitude in the finger during rest and mental stress, as in previous research.14 It applied a constant pressure of 40 to 70 mm Hg to eliminate venous stasis and unload arterial wall tension within the probed part of the finger. The device was connected through thin flexible tubing to an isolated volume reservoir to buffer pressure changes within the probe. Another volume reservoir not connected to the probe served as a pressure reference. The distal compartment of the device was connected to a pressure transducer that sensed pulsatile fluctuations exerted by blood volume changes in the digital arteries. In this study, the device was applied to the index finger. Attention was paid not to use the same extremity for BP measurements. PAT measurements were recorded during rest and mental stress (2-minute speech preparation and 3-minute speaking task). Pressure changes were fed to a personal computer, where the signal was filtered (0.3 to 30 Hz), amplified, stored, and analyzed in an operator-independent manner. Noise was removed from the tracing using electronic filtering. Baseline pulse wave amplitude was determined by averaging during the entire rest period. Stress amplitude was determined by averaging during the 5-minute stress period. Using these measurements, the PAT response was calculated as a ratio of the pulse wave amplitude during stress to at rest. Representative PAT signals and the time course of the study were shown in Figure 1.

  • View full-size image.
  • Figure 1. 

    Representative examples of PAT tracing. (Top tracing) A patient with no significant response to mental stress; (bottom tracing), significant peripheral arterial vasoconstrictive response to mental stress. The PAT response was calculated as a ratio of pulse wave amplitude during stress and at rest.

Results were expressed as mean ± SD for continuous variables and frequency and percentage for categorical variables. Stress hemodynamic responses were calculated as the difference between measurements during stress and at rest. Statistical significance was considered at p <0.05. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to examine the influence of gender on PAT response. In addition to gender, the latter analysis included as covariates co-morbid conditions (diabetes, hypertension, and smoking status), medication status (β blockers, calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors), and body mass index. Log transformation of the PAT ratio was conducted to satisfy the Gaussian distribution assumption of the model. All analyses were performed using SAS statistical software (SAS Inc., Cary, North Carolina).

Back to Article Outline

Results 

A total of 211 patients were studied; 134 men (63%) and 77 women (37%). Baseline demographics by gender groups are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population
VariableMen (n = 134)Women (n = 77)p Value
Mean age (yrs)64 ± 964 ± 9NS
Ethnicity
Caucasian118(89%)68(91%)NS
African American6(5%)7(9%)NS
No. of diseased coronary vessels2.2 ± 0.821.9 ± 0.930.034
Previous MI26(19%)13(17%)NS
Previous percutaneous coronary intervention59(44%)32(42%)NS
History of exercise or adenosine-induced myocardial ischemia43(32%)31(40%)NS
Smoking status:
Never23(17%)40(52%)<0.001
Current22(17%)8(10%)
Former89(66%)29(38%)
Hypertension104(78%)63(82%)NS
Diabetes mellitus48(46%)20(26%)NS
Angina pectoris83(62%)54(70%)NS
Hyperlipidemia122(91%)68(88%)NS
β Blockers111(82%)49(64%)0.002
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors79(59%)31(40%)0.009
Calcium channel blockers21(16%)24(31%)0.008
Hormone replacement therapy 5(6.5%)
Body mass index (kg/m2)30 ± 430 ± 7NS

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics in men and women.

Values expressed as mean ± SD or number (percent).

This information available for only 143 patients (97 men, 46 women).

Mental stress induced significant changes in systolic BP, diastolic BP, HR, and double product compared with the condition at rest in the study population combining both men and women (p <0.001). Comparing hemodynamic responses with mental stress across gender groups did not show differences in systolic BP, diastolic BP, HR, or double product between men and women (p = 0.89, p = 0.53, p = 0.11, and p = 0.13, respectively). Hemodynamic responses to mental stress by gender groups are listed in Table 2.

Table 2. Mental stress–induced hemodynamic and peripheral arterial tonometric (PAT) responses in men and women
Men (n = 134)Women (n = 77)p Value
Hemodynamic responses
Increase in systolic BP (mm Hg)44±2043±200.89
Increase in diastolic BP (mm Hg)28±1129±120.53
Increase in HR (beats/min)19±1222±140.11
Increase in double product5,682±2,9656,353±3,3080.13
PAT response
Unadjusted0.59±0.480.80±0.720.032
Adjusted0.48 (0.38–0.48)0.61 (0.38–0.58)0.037

Values expressed as mean ± SD or mean (95% confidence interval).

Controlling for co-morbid conditions (diabetes, hypertension, and smoking status), body mass index, and medication status (β blockers, calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors).

Most patients (180 [85%]) developed a vasoconstrictive PAT response to mental stress (PAT ratio <1), and 31 patients (15%) developed a vasodilative response (PAT ratio >1). The rate of vasoconstrictive response was significantly higher in men compared with women (91% vs 75%; p = 0.002).

We observed a significantly higher PAT ratio in women compared with men. Mean PAT ratio was 0.80 ± 0.72 in women compared with 0.59 ± 0.48 in men (p = 0.032). Using multivariable analysis to control for possible confounding factors (see statistical section), this gender effect remained significant, with women having higher PAT ratios than men (p = 0.037). The adjusted mean PAT ratio in women was 0.61 (95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.79) compared with 0.48 (95% confidence interval 0.38 to 0.58) in men (Table 2). These findings suggest that men showed a more pronounced vasoconstrictive response during mental stress compared with women.

Back to Article Outline

Discussion 

In this study, we examined for gender-related differences in peripheral arterial response to mental stress. Our findings indicated that men showed a more pronounced peripheral vasoconstrictive response to mental stress compared with women. The average PAT ratio (during stress to at rest) was 0.59 in men compared with 0.80 in women. These findings were consistent with previous reports suggesting that women had decreased sensitivity to the vasoconstrictor effects of norepinephrine, as well as higher basal nitric oxide.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

We explored the relation between gender and vascular reactivity to mental stress in an effort to unravel mechanisms that might explain the observed gender-related differences in prevalence, clinical presentation, and outcomes of CAD. Mental stress has been shown to induce transient myocardial ischemia and other adverse cardiac events in patients with CAD. Peripheral arterial vasoconstriction has consistently been reported as an underlying mechanism for ischemia development in this setting. Laboratory-induced mental stress is a direct simulation of everyday life stress.15, 16, 17, 18, 19 Thus, it is possible that the vascular responses to mental stress observed in this study could represent frequent daily life occurrences. There is also evidence that situational stressors similar to the 1 used in this study could lead to transient endothelial dysfunction lasting up to 4 hours.20 Potentially, these observations could provide a mechanistic link between mental stress and myocardial ischemia and other cardiac events. That men had a more vasoconstrictive response to mental stress may imply higher susceptibility to mental stress–related adverse events. This needs to be validated in a follow-up study.

Arguably, many factors might be operative in explaining the gender differences observed in this study. We believe the findings we observed were caused by true physiologic differences between men and women. Estrogen is a known vasodilator and mediates this effect in part by stimulating the release of nitric oxide and prostacyclin from the vessel wall.21, 22, 23 It is intriguing that we found remarkable differences in this study, although most of our women participants were postmenopausal. Another unique and relevant correlate is the existence of some reports suggesting that women have better coping skills with situational stressors than men.24, 25, 26 This could potentially attenuate their physiologic adrenergic response to psychological stress.

We did not find significant differences in BP or HR responses to mental stress between men and women. Similar findings have been reported in other studies.27 Furthermore; we also found that differences in the mental stress PAT response between men and women did not translate into differences in HR or BP responses. This is not surprising because peripheral arterial tonometry does not measure pressure; instead, it measures peripheral blood volume. Hence, changes in peripheral blood volume may not necessarily reflect changes in BP. Another potential reason for this discrepancy was the BP measurement techniques used in this study. Using the traditional sphygmomanometric brachial BP technique may miss rapid changes that would be captured only by beat-by-beat measurements. Another potential explanation is that in our cohort, men were more likely to be tested under the effects of β blockers or calcium channel blockers (Table 1), which might have blunted their BP or HR response to mental stress.

The gender groups in our study were not prospectively matched in terms of their CAD severity and other co-morbid conditions. The men in this cohort tended to have more severe CAD compared with women. This is probably related to the similar mean age for men and women in this study. Typically, age-matched women are expected to have less severe atherosclerotic CAD compared with their male counterparts.28, 29 However, in our analysis, differences in PAT measurements between men and women remained significant after statistically controlling for CAD severity factors and other co-morbid medical conditions.

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Kneale BJ, Chowienczyk PJ, Cockcroft JR, Coltart DJ, Ritter JM. Vasoconstrictor sensitivity to noradrenaline and NG-monomethyl-l-arginine in men and women. Clin Sci. 1997;93:513–518
  2. Colucci WS, Gimbrone MA, McLaughlin MK, Halpern W, Alexander RW. Increased vascular catecholamine sensitivity and α-adrenergic receptor affinity in female and estrogen-treated male rats. Circ Res. 1982;50:805–811
  3. Freedman RR, Sabharwal SC, Desai N. Sex differences in peripheral vascular adrenergic receptors. Circ Res. 1987;61:581–585
  4. Kneale BJ, Chowienczyk PJ, Brett SE, Coltart DJ, Ritter JM. Gender differences in sensitivity to adrenergic agonists of forearm resistance vasculature. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1233–1238
  5. Li Z, Duckles SP. Influence of gender on vascular reactivity in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1994;286:1426–1431
  6. Sudhir K, Elser MD, Jennings GL, Komesaroff PA. Estrogen supplementation decreases norepinephrine-induced vasoconstriction and total body norepinephrine spillover in perimenopausal women. Hypertension. 1997;30:1538–1543
  7. Sudhir K, Jennings GL, Funder JW, Komesaroff PA. Estrogen enhances basal nitric oxide release in the forearm vasculature in perimenopausal women. Hypertension. 1996;28:330–334
  8. Forte P, Copland M, Smith LM, Milne E, Sutherland J, Benjamin N. Basal nitric oxide synthesis in essential hypertension. Lancet. 1997;349:837–842
  9. Jiang W, Babyak M, Krantz DS, Waugh RA, Coleman RE, Hanson MM, et al. Mental stress-induced myocardial ischemia and cardiac events. JAMA. 1996;275:1651–1656
  10. Jain D, Burg M, Soufer A, Zaret BL. Prognostic implications of mental stress-induced silent left ventricular dysfunction in patients with stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:31–35
  11. Krantz DS, Santiago HT, Kop JW, Bairey Merz CN, Rozanski A, Gottdiener JS. Prognostic value of mental stress testing in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:1292–1297
  12. Sheps DS, McMahon RP, Becker L, Carney RM, Freedland KE, Cohen JD, et al Mental stress-induced ischemia and all-cause mortality in patients with coronary artery disease: results from the Psychophysiological Investigations of Myocardial Ischemia study. Circulation. 2002;105:1780–1784
  13. Kaufmann PG, McMahon RP, Becker LC, Bertolet B, Bonsall R, Chaitman B, et al The Psychophysiological Investigations of Myocardial Ischemia (PIMI) study: objective, methods, and variability of measures. Psychosom Med. 1998;60:56–63
  14. Goor DA, Sheffy J, Schnall RP, Arditti A, Caspi A, Bragdon EE, et al. Peripheral arterial tonometry: a diagnostic method for detection of myocardial ischemia induced during mental stress tests: a pilot study. Clin Cardiol. 2004;27:137–141
  15. Gottdiener JS, Krantz DS, Howell RH, Hecht GM, Klein J, Falconer JJ, et al. Induction of silent myocardial ischemia with mental stress testing: relation to the triggers of ischemia during daily life activities and to ischemic functional severity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:1645–1651
  16. Gullette EC, Blumenthal JA, Babyak M, Jiang W, Waugh RA, Frid DJ, et al. Effects of mental stress on myocardial ischemia during daily life. JAMA. 1997;277:1521–1526
  17. Gabbay FH, Krantz DS, Kop WJ, Hedges SM, Klein J, Gottdiener JS, et al. Triggers of myocardial ischemia during daily life in patients with coronary artery disease: physical and mental activities, anger and smoking. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:585–592
  18. Stone PH, Krantz DS, McMahon RP, Goldberg AD, Becker LC, Chaitman BR, et al Relationship among mental stress-induced ischemia and ischemia during daily life and during exercise: the Psychophysiologic Investigations of Myocardial Ischemia (PIMI) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:1476–1484
  19. Blumenthal JA, Jiang W, Waugh RA, Frid DJ, Morris JJ, Coleman RE, et al. Mental stress-induced ischemia in the laboratory and ambulatory ischemia during daily life. Circulation. 1995;92:2102–2108
  20. Spieker LE, Hurlimann D, Ruschitzka F, Corti R, Enseleit F, Shaw S, et al. Mental stress induces prolonged endothelial dysfunction via endothelin-A receptors. Circulation. 2002;105:2817–2820
  21. Mendelsohn ME. Nongenomic, ER-mediated activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase: how does it work? (What does it mean?). Circ Res. 2000;87:956–960
  22. Arnal JF, Clamens S, Pechet C, Negre-Salvayre A, Allera C, Girolami JP, et al. Ethinylestradiol does not enhance the expression of nitric oxide synthase in bovine aortic endothelial cells but increases the release of bioactive nitric oxide by inhibiting superoxide anion production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:4108–4113
  23. Darblade B, Pendaries C, Krust A, Dupont S, Fouque MJ, Rami J, et al. Estradiol alters nitric oxide production in the mouse aorta through the alpha-, but not beta-, estrogen receptor. Circ Res. 2002;90:413–419
  24. Martin P, Lee H-S. Indicators of active and passive coping in myocardial infarction victims. J Gerontol Psychol Sci. 1992;47:238–241
  25. Bogg J, Thornton E, Bundred P. Gender variability in mood, quality of life and coping following primary myocardial infarction. Coronary Health Care. 2000;4:163–168
  26. LaCharity LA. The experiences of younger women with coronary artery disease. J Women's Health Gend Based Med. 1999;8:773–785
  27. York KM, Hassan M, Li Q, Li H, Fillingim RB, Lucey D, et al. Do men and women differ on measures of mental stress-induced ischemia?. Psychosom Med. 2007;69:918–922
  28. Kannel WB, Abbott RD. Incidence and prognosis of myocardial infarction in women (The Framingham Study). In:  Eaker ED,  Packard B,  Wenger NK,  Clarkson TB,  Tyroler HA editor. Coronary Heart Disease in Women. New York: Haymaker Doymer; 1987;p. 208–214
  29. Lerner DJ, Kannel WB. Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population. Am Heart J. 1986;3:383–390

 This study was supported by Grants HL 070265 and HL 072059 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. This material was also the result of work supported with resources and use of facilities at the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, Florida.

PII: S0002-9149(08)01007-2

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.06.015

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 102, Issue 8 , Pages 970-974, 15 October 2008