Comparison of Peripheral Arterial Response to Mental Stress in Men Versus Women With Coronary Artery Disease

There are profound gender-related differences in the incidence, presentation, and outcomes of coronary artery disease (CAD). These differences are not entirely explained by traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Nontraditional risk factors, such as psychological traits, have increasingly been recognized as important contributors to the genesis and outcomes of CAD. Mental stress induces significant peripheral arterial vasoconstriction, with consequent increases in heart rate and blood pressure. These changes are thought to underlie the development of myocardial ischemia and other mental stress–induced adverse cardiac events in patients with CAD. This study examined for gender-related differences in peripheral arterial response to mental stress in a cohort of patients with CAD using a novel peripheral arterial tonometric (PAT) technique. There were 211 patients (77 women; 37%) with a documented history of CAD and a mean age of 64 ± 9 years. Patients were enrolled from August 18, 2004, to February 21, 2007. Mental stress was induced using a public speaking task. Hemodynamic and PAT measurements were recorded during rest and mental stress. The PAT response was calculated as a ratio of pulse wave amplitude during stress to at rest. PAT responses were compared between men and women. The PAT ratio (during stress to at rest) was significantly higher in women compared with men. Mean PAT ratio was 0.80 ± 0.72 in women compared with 0.59 ± 0.48 in men (p = 0.032). This finding remained significant after controlling for possible confounding factors (p = 0.037). In conclusion, peripheral vasoconstrictive response to mental stress was more pronounced in men compared with women. This finding may suggest that men have higher susceptibility to mental stress–related adverse effects. Additional studies are needed to determine the significance of this finding.