American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 102, Issue 6 , Pages 649-652, 15 September 2008

Cost-Efficiency of Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Chest Pain of Suspected Cardiac Origin and a Nondiagnostic Electrocardiogram

Cardiovascular Division and Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon

Received 14 February 2008; received in revised form 1 May 2008; accepted 1 May 2008. published online 10 July 2008.

Assessment of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected cardiac chest pain and a nondiagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG) is lengthy and costly. It was hypothesized that myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) can be cost-efficient in such patients by detecting those with chest pain that is noncardiac in nature. Accordingly, cost-efficiency was evaluated in 957 patients presenting to the ED with suspected cardiac chest pain, but no ST-segment elevation on the ECG, who underwent MCE. Economic outcome calculations were based on costs estimated from national average Medicare charges adjusted by a cost–charge ratio. Based on routine clinical criteria, 641 patients (67%) were admitted to the hospital, whereas 316 (33%) were discharged directly from the ED. The average cost per patient using routine evaluation was $5,000. Patients with normal MCE results (n = 523) had a very low primary event rate (death, acute myocardial infarction) of 0.6% within 24 hours after presentation, making it relatively safe to discharge patients directly from the ED with a normal MCE result. Hence, if MCE had been used for decision making, 523 patients (55%) would have been discharged directly from the ED and 434 (45%) would have been admitted to the hospital. Preventing unnecessary admissions and tests would have saved an average of $900 per patient, in addition to reducing their ED stay. In conclusion, by excluding cardiac causes in patients presenting to the ED with chest pain and a nondiagnostic ECG, MCE can prevent unnecessary admissions and downstream resource utilization, making it a cost-efficient tool in the evaluation of these patients.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported by a grant from GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Dr. Kaul was supported by Grants RO1-HL48890 and RO1-HL66034 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, and the American Society of Echocardiography, Raleigh, North Carolina.

PII: S0002-9149(08)00830-8

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.05.008

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 102, Issue 6 , Pages 649-652, 15 September 2008