« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 102, Issue 3
, Pages 292-297
, 1 August 2008
Two-Year Outcome of Patients Treated With Sirolimus- Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in an Unselected Population With Coronary Artery Disease (from the REWARDS Registry)
References
- . Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1315–1323
- . A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:221–231
- . Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;295:895–904
- The unrestricted use of paclitaxel- versus sirolimus-eluting stents for coronary artery disease in an unselected population: one-year results of the Taxus-Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (T-SEARCH) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1135–1141
- . Outcomes of 6906 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of drug-eluting stents: report of the DEScover Registry. Circulation. 2006;114:2154–2162
- Sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:653–662
- . Paclitaxel-eluting or sirolimus-eluting stents to prevent restenosis in diabetic patients. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:663–670
- . Sirolimus-eluting stent or paclitaxel-eluting stent vs balloon angioplasty for prevention of recurrences in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;293:165–171
- . Randomized trial of paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents in small coronary vessels. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:260–266
- Sirolimus-eluting stent versus paclitaxel-eluting stent for patients with long coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2006;114:2148–2153
- . Sirolimus-eluting stents vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: meta-analysis of randomized trials artery disease: meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA. 2005;294:819–825
- . Drug eluting stents: an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Heart. 2006;92:641–649
- . Direct and indirect comparison meta-analysis demonstrates the superiority of sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents across 5854 patients. Int J Cardiol. 2007;114:104–105
- . A meta-analysis of 16 randomized trials of sirolimus-eluting stents versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1373–1380
- . Stent thrombosis late after implantation of first-generation drug-eluting stents: a cause for concern. Circulation. 2007;115:1440–1455
- . Late clinical events after clopidogrel discontinuation may limit the benefit of drug-eluting stents an observational study of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2584–2591
- . Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1020–1029
- . A pooled analysis of data comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:989–997
- Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:998–1008
- Analysis of 14 trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1030–1039
- Drug-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcation lesions: a randomized comparison between paclitaxel and sirolimus stents. Am Heart J. 2007;153:15.e1–15.e7
- . Head-to-head comparison between sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with complex coronary artery disease: an intravascular ultrasound study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;67:846–851
- . Three-year follow-up of the first prospective randomized comparison between paclitaxel and sirolimus stents: the TAXi-LATE trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;70:163–166
- . Comparison of paclitaxel-eluting stent and sirolimus-eluting stent expansion at incremental delivery pressures. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2006;7:208–211
PII: S0002-9149(08)00566-3
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.03.053
© 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 102, Issue 3
, Pages 292-297
, 1 August 2008
