American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 102, Issue 3 , Pages 272-279, 1 August 2008

Comparison of Assessment of Native Coronary Arteries by Standard Versus Three-Dimensional Coronary Angiography

  • Pierfrancesco Agostoni, MD

      Affiliations

    • Antwerp Cardiovascular Institute Middelheim, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: 0032-3-2803255; fax: 0032-3-2306511.
  • ,
  • Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
  • ,
  • Glenn Van Langenhove, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Antwerp Cardiovascular Institute Middelheim, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
  • ,
  • Kristoff Cornelis, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Maria Middelares Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
  • ,
  • Paul Vermeersch, MD

      Affiliations

    • Antwerp Cardiovascular Institute Middelheim, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
  • ,
  • Carl Convens, MD

      Affiliations

    • Antwerp Cardiovascular Institute Middelheim, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
  • ,
  • Corrado Vassanelli, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • ,
  • Paul Van Den Heuvel, MD

      Affiliations

    • Antwerp Cardiovascular Institute Middelheim, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
  • ,
  • Frank Van Den Branden, MD

      Affiliations

    • Antwerp Cardiovascular Institute Middelheim, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
  • ,
  • Stefan Verheye, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Antwerp Cardiovascular Institute Middelheim, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium

Received 17 February 2008; received in revised form 11 March 2008; accepted 11 March 2008. published online 27 May 2008.

Vessel foreshortening is a major limitation of standard coronary angiography due to the 2-dimensional representation of 3-dimensional structures. Three-dimensional models may overcome it. The aim of this study was to compare measurements of coronary segments from quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in an operator-selected “working view” of standard 2-dimensional coronary angiography with those from 3-dimensional coronary angiography (3D-CA) reconstruction models, which are automatically generated from software applied to rotational coronary angiographic acquisitions. Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were considered. Two or 3 segments of the artery needing treatment were prespecified, using bifurcations as edges. The operator selected a working view from standard angiography as the view best representing each segment. Rotational angiography was performed, allowing 3-dimensional reconstruction of the selected segments. Additionally a marker guidewire (with 4 markers 10 mm away from one another at the distal tip) was used to further measure segment length, and it was considered the “gold standard” reference. In 36 patients, 81 segments from 12 left anterior descending, 12 circumflex, and 12 right coronary arteries were evaluated. Three-dimensional coronary angiography was always feasible. Although reference vessel diameter was not different between 3D-CA and QCA (p >0.05), segment length measurements were on average 2.3 ± 2.5 mm longer with 3D-CA than with QCA (p <0.001) and 0.4 ± 1.8 mm longer than with marker guidewire measurement (p = 0.047). Marker guidewire measurements were 1.9 ± 2.8 mm longer than QCA measurements (p <0.001). According to Bland-Altman plots, 3D-CA and marker guidewire measurements had the best agreement. In conclusion, 3-dimensional coronary modeling is highly feasible and yields more accurate assessments of the lengths of coronary segments than standard QCA.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9149(08)00561-4

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.03.048

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 102, Issue 3 , Pages 272-279, 1 August 2008