American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 101, Issue 8, Supplement , Pages S20-S26, 17 April 2008

Mechanism of Action of Niacin

  • Vaijinath S. Kamanna, PhD
  • ,
  • Moti L. Kashyap, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Moti L. Kashyap, MD, Atherosclerosis Research Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, 5901 East Seventh Street (11/111-I), Long Beach, California 90822.

Atherosclerosis Research Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Long Beach, California, USA; and Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.

Nicotinic acid (niacin) has long been used for the treatment of lipid disorders and cardiovascular disease. Niacin favorably affects apolipoprotein (apo) B–containing lipoproteins (eg, very-low-density lipoprotein [VLDL], low-density lipoprotein [LDL], lipoprotein[a]) and increases apo A-I–containing lipoproteins (high-density lipoprotein [HDL]). Recently, new discoveries have enlarged our understanding of the mechanism of action of niacin and challenged older concepts. There are new data on (1) how niacin affects triglycerides (TGs) and apo B–containing lipoprotein metabolism in the liver, (2) how it affects apo A-I and HDL metabolism, (3) how it affects vascular anti-inflammatory events, (4) a specific niacin receptor in adipocytes and immune cells, (5) how niacin causes flushing, and (6) the characterization of a niacin transport system in liver and intestinal cells. New findings indicate that niacin directly and noncompetitively inhibits hepatocyte diacylglycerol acyltransferase–2, a key enzyme for TG synthesis. The inhibition of TG synthesis by niacin results in accelerated intracellular hepatic apo B degradation and the decreased secretion of VLDL and LDL particles. Previous kinetic studies in humans and recent in vitro cell culture findings indicate that niacin retards mainly the hepatic catabolism of apo A-I (vs apo A-II) but not scavenger receptor BI–mediated cholesterol esters. Decreased HDL–apo A-I catabolism by niacin explains the increases in HDL half-life and concentrations of lipoprotein A-I HDL subfractions, which augment reverse cholesterol transport. Initial data suggest that niacin, by inhibiting the hepatocyte surface expression of β-chain adenosine triphosphate synthase (a recently reported HDL–apo A-I holoparticle receptor), inhibits the removal of HDL–apo A-I. Recent studies indicate that niacin increases vascular endothelial cell redox state, resulting in the inhibition of oxidative stress and vascular inflammatory genes, key cytokines involved in atherosclerosis. The niacin flush results from the stimulation of prostaglandins D2 and E2 by subcutaneous Langerhans cells via the G protein–coupled receptor 109A niacin receptor. Although decreased free fatty acid mobilization from adipose tissue via the G protein–coupled receptor 109A niacin receptor has been a widely suggested mechanism of niacin to decrease TGs, physiologically and clinically, this pathway may be only a minor factor in explaining the lipid effects of niacin.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported in part by the Merit Review Award Program of the US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, and the Southern California Institute for Education and Research, Long Beach, CA.Statement of author disclosure: Please see the Author Disclosures section at the end of this article.

PII: S0002-9149(08)00253-1

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.02.029

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 101, Issue 8, Supplement , Pages S20-S26, 17 April 2008