American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 101, Issue 8 , Pages 1084-1087, 15 April 2008

Effect of an American Heart Association Get With the Guidelines Program-Based Clinical Pathway on Referral and Enrollment Into Cardiac Rehabilitation After Acute Myocardial Infarction

  • Michael J. Mazzini, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Gerin R. Stevens, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York.
  • ,
  • Deborah Whalen, MSN

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Al Ozonoff, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Gary J. Balady, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: 617-638-8968; Fax: 617-638-8969.

Received 24 September 2007; received in revised form 21 November 2007; accepted 21 November 2007. published online 13 February 2008.

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR)/secondary prevention programs are an important part of patient care after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, only 10% to 15% of eligible patients enroll in such programs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of an American Heart Association Get With the Guidelines (GWTG)-based clinical pathway on referral and enrollment into CR after AMI. Patients (n = 780) admitted to a single center during an 18-month period with AMI and discharged to home were evaluated retrospectively for referral and enrollment into CR programs. A total of 714 patients (92%) were on the GWTG pathway; 392 (55%) were referred and 135 (19%) were enrolled into CR. Higher referral was associated with pathway use (odds ratio [OR] 2.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 4.9, p = 0.03), percutaneous coronary intervention (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.9 to 5.2, p <0.0001), and in-patient physical therapy consultation (OR 13, 95% CI 8.2 to 20.5, p <0.0001). Ethnicity did not affect referral, but was the only variable associated with lower enrollment. Hispanic and black patients had 92% (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.55, p = 0.02) and 57% (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.05, p = 0.06) lower odds to enroll compared with white patients, respectively. In conclusion, use of the American Heart Association GWTG pathway showed a significantly higher referral rate to CR after AMI than previously reported in the literature. Nonetheless, most referred patients did not enroll. Strategies to bridge the gap between referral and enrollment in CR should be incorporated into AMI clinical pathways, with special emphasis on increasing enrollment in ethnic minorities.

 

PII: S0002-9149(07)02445-9

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.11.063

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 101, Issue 8 , Pages 1084-1087, 15 April 2008