American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 100, Issue 9 , Pages 1410-1415, 1 November 2007

Incidence of Coronary Artery Disease in Siblings of Patients With Premature Coronary Artery Disease: 10 Years of Follow-up

  • Dhananjay Vaidya, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: 410-955-7781; fax: 410-955-0321.
  • ,
  • Lisa R. Yanek, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
  • ,
  • Taryn F. Moy, MS

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
  • ,
  • Thomas A. Pearson, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
  • ,
  • Lewis C. Becker, MD

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
  • ,
  • Diane M. Becker, ScD

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland

Received 9 April 2007; received in revised form 21 May 2007; accepted 21 May 2007.

Although family history of premature coronary artery disease (CAD) confers increased risk of CAD, the magnitude of this increase beyond that expected from the risk factors incorporated in the Framingham Risk Equation (FRE) remains unknown. We prospectively determined the accuracy of the FRE 10-year incident CAD events prediction in initially healthy siblings of patients with documented premature CAD. We recruited 784 siblings (30 to 59 years) of 449 patients hospitalized with CAD <60 years of age (1983 to 1995). We compared the estimated 10-year incidence of total CAD events by the gender-specific FREs at baseline, to the observed incidence at 10 years of follow-up. In men, the 10-year actual CAD event rate was 20%, only half of which was predicted by the FRE (12% vs 20%, p <0.001). In women, the observed CAD event rate was 7.1% (p <0.001 vs men), modestly but not significantly greater than the 6.3% predicted by the FRE (p = 0.34). Thus, there was a significant 66.6% excess risk in men, and a nonsignificant 12.7% excess risk in women beyond the risk predicted by the FRE for total CAD events. The FRE and its known classic risk factor profile failed to accurately predict total incident 10-year CAD events in individuals with a sibling history of premature CAD, most particularly in men. In conclusion, in families with a history of premature CAD, the excess risk observed cannot be attributed to traditional risk factors, suggesting a major role for as yet undetermined genetic and other susceptibility factors.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This research was supported by grants NR02241, R01 HL49762, and R01 HL59684 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, and the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine General Clinical Research Center, National Institutes of Health Grant M01 RR00052.

PII: S0002-9149(07)01458-0

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.06.031

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 100, Issue 9 , Pages 1410-1415, 1 November 2007