American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 99, Issue 6 , Pages 793-796, 15 March 2007

Impact of Initial Heart Rate and Systolic Blood Pressure on Relation of Age and Mortality Among Fibrinolytic-Treated Patients With Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Presenting With Cardiogenic Shock

  • Rajendra H. Mehta, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Medical Center and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: 919-668-8971; fax: 919-668-7059.
  • ,
  • Robert M. Califf, MD

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Medical Center and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Qinghong Yang, MS

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Medical Center and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Karen S. Pieper, MS

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Medical Center and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Harvey D. White, DSc

      Affiliations

    • Greenlane Cardiovascular Service, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
  • ,
  • E. Magnus Ohman, MD

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Medical Center and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Robert A. Harrington, MD

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Medical Center and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Christopher B. Granger, MD

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Medical Center and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina

Received 29 July 2006; received in revised form 11 October 2006; accepted 11 October 2006. published online 20 January 2007.

Older age is associated with worse outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, significant heterogeneity exists in different age groups with respect to outcomes. Identification of factors that modulate age-related risk of death in patients with cardiogenic shock may help clinical decision making and facilitate patient counseling. Accordingly, we evaluated 761 patients with STEMI who presented with cardiogenic shock and received fibrinolysis. We categorized patients into 3 age groups (<60 years, n = 224; 60 to 75 years, n = 360; and ≥75 years, n = 177). Death at 30 days occurred in 118 patients <60 years of age (53%), 214 patients 60 to 75 years of age (59%), and 127 patients ≥75 years of age (72%) with cardiogenic shock. Factors associated with death (per 10-U change) on multivariable analysis were older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23 to 1.66), higher heart rate (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.35), and lower systolic blood pressure (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.41, c index 0.79). Important interactions were found with age, heart rate, and systolic blood pressure, suggesting that, although age was a strong independent predictor of death in patients with a heart rate ≤100 beats/min, it was less strongly related to death in patients with a heart rate >100 beats/min in whom prognosis was uniformly poor. Further, elderly patients with a systolic blood pressure >80 mm Hg had substantial chance of recovery. In contrast, those with a systolic blood pressure ≤80 mm Hg and heart rate >100 beats/min had 30-day death rates >90% even if they were young. In conclusion, our data suggest that, although elderly patients with cardiogenic shock have poor prognosis, presenting heart rate and systolic blood pressure provide important information to differentiate who may have greater chance of recovery. This information may help physicians in deciding treatment options for patients with cardiogenic shock and counseling them about their risks.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by the Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.

PII: S0002-9149(06)02366-6

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.10.035

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 99, Issue 6 , Pages 793-796, 15 March 2007