American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 99, Issue 3 , Pages 374-378, 1 February 2007

Comparison of Progression of Coronary Calcium in Postmenopausal Women on Versus Not on Estrogen/Progestin Therapy

  • Alexander Becker, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: 49-89-7095-2229; fax: 49-89-7095-2224.
  • ,
  • Alexander Leber, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
  • ,
  • Franz von Ziegler, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
  • ,
  • Christoph Becker, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
  • ,
  • Andreas Knez, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany

Received 6 February 2006; received in revised form 22 August 2006; accepted 22 August 2006. published online 11 December 2006.

The prophylactic effect of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy on coronary atherosclerosis remains controversial. We, therefore, examined the influence of combined estrogen/progestin therapy on the progression of coronary calcium as a marker of coronary atherosclerosis. We determined the extent of coronary calcium in 277 women (age 57 ± 6 years, time after menopause 3.9 ± 2.4 years, group I) at the beginning of hormone replacement therapy using multislice computed tomography. For quantification, we calculated the volume score. After an observation period of 3 years, we determined the progression of coronary calcium in a second scan. The results were compared with those from an age- and risk factor-adjusted group of postmenopausal women without hormone substitution (group II). No significant difference was found in the volume score (59 ± 95 vs 58 ± 88) or risk factor distribution between the 2 groups on study entry. In 56 women of group I and 52 women of group II, coronary calcium could be excluded on the initial scan (p = NS). After a mean observation time of 38.5 ± 4.9 months, we observed no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding an increase in volume score (17 ± 24 vs 19 ± 27, p = NS) or the fraction of women with an increase in volume score (82.2% vs 84.2%). In conclusion, a reduced progression of coronary calcium in postmenopausal women on combined estrogen/progestin therapy could not be observed compared with a matched group of women without hormone substitution.

 

PII: S0002-9149(06)02065-0

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.08.040

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 99, Issue 3 , Pages 374-378, 1 February 2007