Determinants of Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in the RAte Control Versus Electrical Cardioversion (RACE) Study
This report evaluated the correlates of sudden cardiac and nonsudden cardiac death in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation randomized to rate or rhythm control in the RAte Control vs Electrical cardioversion (RACE) study. Sudden cardiac death was observed in 16 patients, 8 patients in each group. Previous myocardial infarction resulted in a 4.9-fold increased risk of sudden death (95% confidence interval 1.8 to 13.2). The use of β blockers showed their protective nature (hazard ratio 0.2, 95% confidence interval 0.05 to 0.9). The randomized treatment strategy, heart rhythm during follow-up, use of antiarrhythmic drugs, and number of stroke risk factors were not associated with sudden cardiac death. In conclusion, the treatment of underlying disease, rather than the heart rhythm, seems essential to prevent mortality.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
The RACE Study was supported by grants from the Center for Health Care Insurance (Grant OG96-047), Diemen, The Netherlands; the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and 3M Pharma, Leiden, The Netherlands.
PII: S0002-9149(06)01185-4
doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.04.038
© 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
