American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 98, Issue 2 , Pages 272-274, 15 July 2006

Effect of Exercise on Frequency of Stent Fracture in the Superficial Femoral Artery

Cardiovascular Division, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan.

Received 6 December 2005; received in revised form 19 January 2006; accepted 19 January 2006. published online 06 June 2006.

Stent fracture has emerged as a new problem in the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the superficial femoral artery (SFA). The aim of our study was to delineate the factors influencing nitinol stent fracture in the SFA. Forty consecutive patients with peripheral artery disease who underwent rescue stenting with a nitinol stent (Luminexx, Bard) in the SFA were enrolled between May 2004 and January 2005. Follow-up angiography was performed 13.6 ± 1.0 months later to detect stent fracture. Stent fracture occurred in 11 patients (28%). Lesion length >100 mm, the number of stents used, the lesion involving the distal SFA, chronic total occlusion, and walking >5,000 steps per day were more frequently observed in those with stent fracture than in those without fracture. Of these variables, walking >5,000 steps per day was the strongest independent determinant associated with stent fracture by discriminant analysis (p = 0.0027). Vigorous exercise adversely affects stent fracture in patients implanted with a nitinol stent in the SFA.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9149(06)00683-7

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.091

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 98, Issue 2 , Pages 272-274, 15 July 2006