American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 97, Issue 11 , Pages 1661-1666, 1 June 2006

Comparison of Two-Dimensional Speckle and Tissue Velocity Based Strain and Validation With Harmonic Phase Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

Received 20 November 2005; received in revised form 20 December 2005; accepted 20 December 2005. published online 24 April 2006.

Two-dimensional (2-D) strain (ε2-D) on the basis of speckle tracking is a new technique for strain measurement. This study sought to validate ε2-D and tissue velocity imaging (TVI)–based strain (εTVI) with tagged harmonic-phase (HARP) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thirty patients (mean age 62 ± 11 years) with known or suspected ischemic heart disease were evaluated. Wall motion (wall motion score index 1.55 ± 0.46) was assessed by an expert observer. Three apical images were obtained for longitudinal strain (16 segments) and 3 short-axis images for radial and circumferential strain (18 segments). Radial εTVI was obtained in the posterior wall. HARP MRI was used to measure principal strain, expressed as maximal length change in each direction. Values for ε2-D, εTVI, and HARP MRI were comparable for all 3 strain directions and were reduced in dysfunctional segments. The mean difference and correlation between longitudinal ε2-D and HARP MRI (2.1 ± 5.5%, r = 0.51, p <0.001) were similar to those between longitudinal εTVI and HARP MRI (1.1 ± 6.7%, r = 0.40, p <0.001). The mean difference and correlation were more favorable between radial ε2-D and HARP MRI (0.4 ± 10.2%, r = 0.60, p <0.001) than between radial εTVI and HARP MRI (3.4 ± 10.5%, r = 0.47, p <0.001). For circumferential strain, the mean difference and correlation between ε2-D and HARP MRI were 0.7 ± 5.4% and r = 0.51 (p <0.001), respectively. In conclusion, the modest correlations of echocardiographic and HARP MRI strain reflect the technical challenges of the 2 techniques. Nonetheless, ε2-D provides a reliable tool to quantify regional function, with radial measurements being more accurate and feasible than with TVI. Unlike εTVI, ε2-D provides circumferential measurements.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported in part by a project grant (210218) from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Canberra, Australia. Software and technical support were provided by GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, Wisconsin, for this project.

PII: S0002-9149(06)00381-X

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.12.063

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 97, Issue 11 , Pages 1661-1666, 1 June 2006