American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 97, Issue 11 , Pages 1657-1660, 1 June 2006

Evaluating the Optimal Activated Clotting Time During Carotid Artery Stenting

  • Jacqueline Saw, MD

      Affiliations

    • Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    • Corresponding Author Information Corresponding author: Tel: 604-875-5547; fax: 604-875-5563.
  • ,
  • Christopher Bajzer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Ivan P. Casserly, MD

      Affiliations

    • Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado
  • ,
  • Emilio Exaire, MD

      Affiliations

    • National Institute of Health, University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • ,
  • Cameron Haery, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Ravish Sachar, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • David Lee, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Alex Abou-Chebl, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Jay S. Yadav, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

Received 15 November 2005; received in revised form 20 December 2005; accepted 20 December 2005. published online 24 April 2006.

Carotid artery stenting is an alternative to carotid endarterectomy for patients at high risk for surgery for carotid artery stenosis. Although unfractionated heparin is routinely used, there are no published data evaluating the optimal activated clotting time during carotid stenting. In a retrospective analysis of 605 patients who underwent carotid stenting using unfractionated heparin at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, the optimal peak procedural activated clotting time associated with the lowest combined incidence of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction was 250 to 299 seconds.

 

PII: S0002-9149(06)00380-8

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.12.062

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 97, Issue 11 , Pages 1657-1660, 1 June 2006